Has Sweden got it right do you think? My step son lives in Stockholm and definitely has a far more relaxed attitude ... but the numbers don't appear to suggest that what's going on there is any more effective than here. Indeed, as mentioned elsewhere there's an argument to say it's worse (but I won't get involved in that)
View attachment 122661
Yes. As you can see on the chart you posted we have the rougly the same number of new cases / new intensive care cases / new deaths now as three weels ago despite no lockdown which means our curve is more or less fla. Since our approach is not to reach zero cases, but a steady curve until immunity/seasonal aspects start doing the job "naturally", it seems to be working.
I dont get how it is worse when deaths per capita are lower (despitecounting care home deaths every day) while also keeping society almost entirely open.
You were very critical of Sweden's approach until recently. What's changed out of interest?!
I believed in the Imperial College report about what happens with no measures, and had expected about 20 000 deaths by now and our intensive care units filled around April 10, and the exponential curve of cases/serious cases/deaths to keep rising for longer than it did. But its now turning out that despite not doing much at all, our curve is flat and our plateu managable.
Our approach was that we start with soft measures and if it gets too bad we take stronger measures. A gradual tightening of measures rather than a gradual loosening, but we never reached what we consider "lockdown levels of bad" (knock on wood) and if this shit comes in a second wave next fall/winter (very likely), we will likely be in a fantastic spot.
I don't think it's working.. Seems to me the numbers are getting worse in Sweden at the moment.
Alright, but it seems to the numbers that the numbers of intensive care patients and deaths are steady with perhaps a tiny decrease.