D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
Hopefully the virus wipes out 50% of Trump supporters, and the other 50% shoot each other.
Sent from my SM-A600FN using Tapatalk
Really WTF. That's a pretty awful thing to say there.
Hopefully the virus wipes out 50% of Trump supporters, and the other 50% shoot each other.
Sent from my SM-A600FN using Tapatalk
Oh come on, a few less million idiots after all this is surely a good thing..Really WTF. That's a pretty awful thing to say there.
I don't buy it. A virus that can lead to no symptoms, or cause pneumonia so severe that people drown in their own pulmonary exudate?
As [MENTION=4019]Triggaaar[/MENTION] has noted, there may be something wrong with the information coming from China and, increasingly, I am beginning to agree.
A few fewer.Oh come on, a few less million idiots
Also in Iceland* https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/01/europe/iceland-testing-coronavirus-intl/index.html
* The country, not the freezer centre formerly known as Bejam.
With the expected lag in mortality, the new cases are the thing to watch and that is not highly encouraging but it is something to grasp onto.U.K stats just in. 708 new deaths, 3700 new cases. New cases down on yesterday.
6 weeks seems to be the target for lockdown, to constrain the spread then you can apply contact testing to the few cases that pop up.
U.K stats just in. 708 new deaths, 3700 new cases. New cases down on yesterday.
With the expected lag in mortality, the new cases are the thing to watch and that is not highly encouraging but it is something to grasp onto.
How do we test less people day on day? Aren’t we ramping up? Serious, non critical, question.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Very valid question. And that's what irritates me about their approach. Hancock said back in January that we were fully ready for this, and had a world leading test ready and waiting. Then it's 'PPE will be with everyone in days'. Days pass, and it's still talk about 'will be ready, ramping up, PPE will be got to front-line staff'. All things for the future rather than now. And also, this talk of the target of 10,000 tests a day being met is a bit misleading if it's really only under 7,000 actual people - the constant references to 10,000 a day implies 10,000 people. It's not.
They're certainly ramping up the use of the phrase ramping up.
U.K stats just in. 708 new deaths, 3700 new cases. New cases down on yesterday.
Those stats are only for those in hospital. Many more are dying in homes, and not being tested or treated.
13 in one care home.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-52165397
My FIL (90 with underlying health problems) went downhill quickly on Tuesday in his (excellent) care home. Was tested immediately and visited by paramedics and GP. No one thought it was CV19 because he’d had breathing problems before. Died yesterday pm and CV19 test came back positive. Another resident died 2 hours later. The virus is in and doing its worse. The fabulous staff are devastated.
My FIL (90 with underlying health problems) went downhill quickly on Tuesday in his (excellent) care home. Was tested immediately and visited by paramedics and GP. No one thought it was CV19 because he’d had breathing problems before. Died yesterday pm and CV19 test came back positive. Another resident died 2 hours later. The virus is in and doing its worse. The fabulous staff are devastated.
Fewer people tested though, >1,000 fewer than yesterday (6,570 people tested, 10,984 tests - so almost half had to have two tests? - yesterday was 7,651 & 11,764)
Fewer people with symptoms admitted to hospital.How do we test less people day on day? Aren’t we ramping up? Serious, non critical, question.