amexee
New member
Princess Royal in Haywards Heath are preparing a ward right now, for covid patients. Already have a few suspected cases
Feels like I'm watching a movie. We need to be doing the same.
[tweet]1238043173840183298[/tweet]
Who knows what "loads" is? Who can realistically put a timeframe on it? How many will die in the meantime? What's 'acceptable'?
Who will calculate when mass gatherings of 5k, 10k or 50k can be accepted (eg won't put a burden on health services if they cause an outbreak)?
So, so many questions....
I've heard of a place, a community, they are still free of this virus. It's about 15 miles from here, a disused cement works. If we travel at night......
Princess Royal in Haywards Heath are preparing a ward right now, for covid patients. Already have a few suspected cases
Agreed. Apologies if I ever appeared to be in that group. It wasn’t my intention, and I acknowledge in the early days of this situation I did think it was being slightly overblown.
I 100% don’t now. I think some element of social distancing should be commenced immediately.
One question - once into a more stringent lockdown - how will we deal with the situation of people who have had the virus and want to go back out to help others/get shopping for those in quarantine? Based on the idea that it is very unlikely to contract Coronavirus twice, it would be potentially frustrating to have thousands or tens of thousands of people who are “post-Corona” having to continue isolating if they could be of more use helping those who are still having to isolate?
He did not suggest 'taking it on the chin'. He reasoned along the lines of 'some say lock down, some say take it on the chin but our line is to find the balance'. I have no problem with that, it is reasonable whether you are a Tory or Labor voter. I wish that this statement would stop being misquoted.[tweet]1238038497052762113[/tweet]
This is stupidity and why Johnson is advocating 'taking it on the chin'. Herd immunity is attained by vaccines, but there is no vaccine available yet.
Johnson is just saying it's survival of the fittest. Tough if you aren't one of them.
[tweet]1238038497052762113[/tweet]
This is stupidity and why Johnson is advocating 'taking it on the chin'. Herd immunity is attained by vaccines, but there is no vaccine available yet.
Johnson is just saying it's survival of the fittest. Tough if you aren't one of them.
[TWEET]1238043138834477058[/TWEET]
I have come to the conclusion ( maybe rubbish ) that the 'story' about not taking measures too early because people will break them later is a cover story.
The Government want a significant number of cases to create an immunity in part of the population. I can see it would be monstrous for a politician to admit this.
He did not suggest 'taking it on the chin'. He reasoned along the lines of 'some say lock down, some say take it on the chin but our line is to find the balance'. I have no problem with that, it is reasonable whether you are a Tory or Labor voter. I wish that this statement would stop being misquoted.
I've been trying to think of an analogy for what I think is trying to be done. This is it. It's not very good, but might do the job.
1. There's a bath that can hold the entire UK population. The government need to fill that bath.
2. There's a bucket that sits between the tap the government have and the bath. The bucket has a hole in the bottom of it. The bucket is the NHS.
3. When the tap is turned on, 80% of the water can go straight into the bath, but 20% needs to go into the bucket.
4. The government will be trying to turn the tap on, releasing the water, such that the water flowing into the top of the bucket is matched by the water falling through the hole in the bottom.
The problem is too much water going into the bucket and it overflows.
Immunity will probably come from being infected and recovering before a vaccine is ready.
I seem to recall being accused of scaremongering
Agreed. Apologies if I ever appeared to be in that group. It wasn’t my intention, and I acknowledge in the early days of this situation I did think it was being slightly overblown.
It will for those that survive. How many vulnerable people will survive? Those having cancer treatment, immuno suppressed, COPD and over 65s?