Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
No idea, don't do all these graphs, but is our growth of infection still running parallel to that of Italy, albeit a week or so behind?
No one I know is panicking. No one on here is demonstrably panicking that I can see.
Your response to new UK figures was:
(Nobody on here acted 'horrified')
Your response to enlightening new data offering a fresh perspective was:
That's literally being a troll. Or just a dick.
Your response to new UK figures was:
(Nobody on here acted 'horrified')
Your response to enlightening new data offering a fresh perspective was:
That's literally being a troll. Or just a dick.
still not crazy though is it
You are trolling and I'll stop it if you don't.
Look, read the below...
No one I know is panicking. No one on here is demonstrably panicking that I can see.
No one is disputing that most people who get this will be OK.
However, the potential numbers at play here are frightening which is where most of the concern stems from...
- Due to expected exponential growth of the virus a lot of people will be sick requiring specialist help at the same time. This could happen in the very near future.
- The NHS could become overwhelmed very quickly due to lack of resources, both equipment and care professionals (it is estimated up to 25% of NHS staff could be off sick themselves at times. Some, of course, will also die and never return to work)
- People who would otherwise be nursed to recovery may well die.
- Those who have other ongoing serious conditions may well die as the NHS is unable to continue the treatment they require.
- Those who need ad hoc specialist care - those involved in road accidents, mother's who have complications giving birth - may die as they can't be cared for properly.
Kids may largely get off lightly with this, but once you multiply this up over 30, 40, 60 or even 80% of the population, many will die. Maybe they just get unlucky with the virus, maybe they had previously unknown health complications.
The above applies to other age groups - all low risk, but no one is "no risk".
The odds may be on my side and on my family's side, but I can't be a blasé prick about the potential implications of this on others, probable in the eyes of many who know far more than you and I about this.
Maybe that's not the case, but you definitely can't test people who don't report symptoms or have such mild ones they are dismissed.
Sorry - are you saying that a doctor say, not realising they are a carrier should not be tested ? Or anyone working in or visiting a hospital. Or care home workers. Or someone coming in on a flight from Milan ? If they look ok - that's fine ?
There is a problem with testing capacity that the government are apparently addressing. And there is the (current) three day delay in getting results returned. And this is an example of the potential issue that Bozza described - that the NHS resources are stretched and can't deal with their standard routines that keep other issues under control for people.
I'm really not at all bothered about catching it
I am, though, very worried about (perhaps without knowing) passing it on to someone more vulnerable
I really fear for the consequences of an explosion in the number of cases on the NHS, staff in the NHS and the vulnerable (been exchanging messages with my daughter today on it - some of the measures her hospital are having to take are drastic, some of the decisions are genuinely shocking - like putting the planned isolation ward next to the one full of elderly patients with auto-immune deficiencies - and the staff themselves are dreading the consequences. Some people will be left to die................
Not had any figures from Italy today? Would be interesting to see if the new measures are taking effect.
Not had any figures from Italy today? Would be interesting to see if the new measures are taking effect.
Italy exceeded their critical care capacity days ago. The European intensive care community is relatively close knit - we all have friends and colleagues in EU hospitals and we see each other often at conferences and the like. The news from Italy is incredibly sad. The units are full, no operations are occurring as patients are being ventilated in theaters. Portable ventilators are being used.
Italy recently released a set of COVID guidelines aimed at addressing resource allocation in times of severe demand and lack of supply. This is the first time I have seen guidelines in a first world country suggest that older patients (who have survivable illness) are not considered for intubation and ventilation in order to allow capacity to treat younger patients.
You are trolling and I'll stop it if you don't.
Look, read the below...
No one I know is panicking. No one on here is demonstrably panicking that I can see.
No one is disputing that most people who get this will be OK.
However, the potential numbers at play here are frightening which is where most of the concern stems from...
- Due to expected exponential growth of the virus a lot of people will be sick requiring specialist help at the same time. This could happen in the very near future.
- The NHS could become overwhelmed very quickly due to lack of resources, both equipment and care professionals (it is estimated up to 25% of NHS staff could be off sick themselves at times. Some, of course, will also die and never return to work)
- People who would otherwise be nursed to recovery may well die.
- Those who have other ongoing serious conditions may well die as the NHS is unable to continue the treatment they require.
- Those who need ad hoc specialist care - those involved in road accidents, mother's who have complications giving birth - may die as they can't be cared for properly.
Kids may largely get off lightly with this, but once you multiply this up over 30, 40, 60 or even 80% of the population, many will die. Maybe they just get unlucky with the virus, maybe they had previously unknown health complications.
The above applies to other age groups - all low risk, but no one is "no risk".
The odds may be on my side and on my family's side, but I can't be a blasé prick about the potential implications of this on others, probable in the eyes of many who know far more than you and I about this.
I'm interested in the data you've posted and will continue to read through it, but I'd say that Italy didn't jump from 4 to 470 in 7 days, but instead they have a lot more than 4 cases, but they weren't aware they had them. Of course all countries will have more than they realise, as not everyone has been tested, but I'd say Italy's figures were further behind the actual number at the start, before they realised what was happening.It has taken the UK 11 days to go from 24 cases to 373. Italy went from 4 to 470 in 7 days, with a jump of 147 cases in a single day taking them to that point.
I'm massively panicking but it's probably just me.
Blimey with all Italy doing they still seeing big daily increases
No, far from it. I'm saying are the authorities aware of everyone who is self isolating? Do we have risks out there we simply don't know about because they are not very ill and not obviously connected to a diagnosed case? Health care people I have spoken to believe the instances in this country are far higher than the official figures, but not for the reasons dingodan stated.
Agreed, and I'm calling that out too. If there is an issue with test capacity, then you are going to prioritise your test kits, non?