In the UK, that would mean over 50 million people catch it. Most would be fine, but millions would need a high level of care, which clearly wouldn't be available, as hospitals can't take on an extra few million patients. A lack of care would mean a higher fatality rate, but even if it was only 1%, then that's half a million deaths, as well as the other deaths caused by an NHS which wouldn't be able to cope.
If we can slow the spread down and hope that summer also helps stop it, we can hopefully keep the pressure on medical staff down, and hopefully have a vaccine ready before as much as 80% of the population get it.
Why would panicking put much more strain on medical services? Having a rampant, unchecked virus is what would put the most strain on medical services.
They have started applying restrictions because of the high rate of infection. Obviously had they had the restrictions in place earlier, the infections wouldn't have been so high.
They were talking about this on R4, a specialist in pandemic control pointed out that Italy actually had restrictions in place before the high infection rate. Closed schools, shutdown of public transport, no flights etc. Despite this, they have one of the highest infection rates in Europe.
To summarise he said that these restrictions don’t actually slow down the infection rate that much. It’s a virus. It will travel whatever the restrictions in place.
Authorities need to be seen to be doing something but measures are pretty ineffective.
As mentioned by many experts, all you can do is concentrate on helping the most vulnerable, work on a vaccine and let it run its course.
The rest is just ineffective placating which has the opposite effect and panics people rather than reassuring them.
Maybe they’re wrong, maybe I’m wrong to believe them but it makes the most sense to me.
It’s an opinion based on debates I’ve listened to. Either way, I guarantee you millions are not going to die in the UK.
Last edited: