London Irish
Well-known member
He was doing OK (Everton, Ajax away), better than Baleba. It's obvious there was a blow up after the red that could not be settledWhy can’t it be football related? He’s not adjusted to English football, it happens
He was doing OK (Everton, Ajax away), better than Baleba. It's obvious there was a blow up after the red that could not be settledWhy can’t it be football related? He’s not adjusted to English football, it happens
But he played after the red?He was doing OK (Everton, Ajax away), better than Baleba. It's obvious there was a blow up after the red that could not be settled
It does worry me. A little. At least.Another thing thats clear about RDZ. There's no way back.
Sanchez, Trossard, and now Dahoud.
It isn't obvious at all. It's speculation.He was doing OK (Everton, Ajax away), better than Baleba. It's obvious there was a blow up after the red that could not be settled
I said at the time of the Sanchez issue there does seem to be a flaw with RDZ that he is seemingly unable to resolve spats he has with players. Trossard, Sanchez and now Dahoud in a little over a year.He was doing OK (Everton, Ajax away), better than Baleba. It's obvious there was a blow up after the red that could not be settled
I suppose we wouldn’t know about the spats he has with players when they are resolved though. We mainly know about Trossard and Sanchez because they took big actions like refusing to play.I said at the time of the Sanchez issue there does seem to be a flaw with RDZ that he is seemingly unable to resolve spats he has with players. Trossard, Sanchez and now Dahoud in a little over a year.
I agree but it’s very unusual for such players to be given so little game time to judge this. It would be quick if he was pushed out in the summer but this is ridiculous on that count.I suppose we wouldn’t know about the spats he has with players when they are resolved though. We mainly know about Trossard and Sanchez because they took big actions like refusing to play.
Tbf I think it seems that Dahoud is not doing what RDZ wants him to do but I am not sure if there is definitely an argument going on there. You can still see him in some of the training pics etc and he looks happy enough in them. Sometimes players come in and they just aren’t quite what we thought they were or turn out not to be what we needed after all.
Only if he ends up being worth £9m to Stuttgart!Sky sports saying they will have a £9m option to buy at the end of the season. I mean if he’s surplus here then £9m isn’t bad given he was free to us.
Sky sports saying they will have a £9m option to buy at the end of the season. I mean if he’s surplus here then £9m isn’t bad given he was free to us.
You've been released then. Welcome back.Terry says he's USELESS and he will DRIVE him to SWITZERLAND himself to get rid of him
Well obviously.Doesn't mean they will actually buy him off us.
lol- he's not an asset, he's a liability. Costing 55,000 a week to sit at home chilling out and occupying a squad place.Why would you give away an asset for free when someone may reimburse you for it? Loan has wages paid or largely contributed to and you retain your asset.
Didn't Sanchez refuse to be a sub? Not heard anything about a spat with RDZI said at the time of the Sanchez issue there does seem to be a flaw with RDZ that he is seemingly unable to resolve spats he has with players. Trossard, Sanchez and now Dahoud in a little over a year.
what lost income? his wages are an expense. If he plays somewhere else, they pay him and we don't.I wonder if those suggesting we let him go for free would be happy to have an extra £200 supplement on every season ticket at the Amex to offset the lost income?
I guess they mean the 9m Euro we 'might' get?what lost income? his wages are an expense. If he plays somewhere else, they pay him and we don't.
KeirnanHas to be someone coming in … surely ?
Not necessarily the case, there are instances where the parent club sub some of the players wages whilst on loan.what lost income? his wages are an expense. If he plays somewhere else, they pay him and we don't.