So he's denied racially abusing someone? and that's different to denying racially abusing someone how?
My point is from what's come out no-one at the time heard the abuse, they all responded the video. It would be pretty hard to prove his version of events is false if no-one else heard him say it at the time and the evidence doesn't contradict him.
I don't like Terry much but I don't see how unless something else comes out the could punish him. My only thoughts in his defence are I find it a little odd he ran to the other end of the pitch and then a racial insult at a player at the other end of and no-one heard this
Let's just wait and see what the CPS make of it. Terry's story does not add up to me and it's down to whether there is sufficient weight to the circumstances (presuming no other witnesses are found) to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt.