Ahh........the type you see in The Sun on Page 3?
Lassie is 7 years old and from Barking, she loves walking in the park and licking her crotch etc?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Lost Prophets singer charged with rape of 1 year old.
- Thread starter Driver8
- Start date
Ahh........the type you see in The Sun on Page 3?
Lassie is 7 years old and from Barking, she loves walking in the park and licking her crotch etc?
The Truth
Banned
This will sort out your query
This is a very typical mild animal porn pic:
Here is a typical extreme animal porn picture:
ps These pics weren't sent for sexual desire or downgrading of the animals. I'm just passing on info which will help others to understand the differences between wrong and right. Sorry if these pics were too explicit, my intention is not to offend anyone or any animal.
Last edited:
I never knew that you are PETE TOWNSEND
The Truth
Banned
erm, I'm his mate, just borrowing his laptop.
Gilliver's Travels
Peripatetic
Careful. Pete Townsend is the name of the bloke (well, one of several, allegedly) who was enjoying the favours of the late HRH Princess Margaret.
I think, El Pres, you must shurely on this occasion be thinking of Pete Townshend.
I had always thought that, IF the dog was wagging its tail, technically it’s not rape!!
The Truth
Banned
Buzzer
Languidly Clinical
- Oct 1, 2006
- 26,121
I can't think of many situations where I wouldn't know if my cock was up a dog's arse.
The Truth
Banned
Have you been to Amsterdam?
Meade's Ball
Well-known member
Phat Baz 68
Get a ****ing life mate !
- Apr 16, 2011
- 5,026
Raping a one year old !! What an evil sick pig !! 
The Truth
Banned
Raping a one year old !! What an evil sick pig !!
I don't think he actually raped the baby but was conspiring too. Not that it's any better.
Buzzer
Languidly Clinical
- Oct 1, 2006
- 26,121
I've been twice. Once ski-ing and the other time to see Anne Frank's drum kit.
The Truth
Banned
I take it this is code language for- 'Yes I've been loads, shagged a marmot and visited The Anne Franks museum'?
- Oct 17, 2008
- 14,606
Yeah... that's the other thing with conspiracy, it's very hard to prove because a lot of the time no crime has occurred. The evidence needs to be clear and simple.
I recently sat on a jury which was deadlocked 8-3 in favour of acquittal in a conspiracy case which was, to be fair, a f***ing farce. Unfortunately, the three who were finding "guilty" said they thought he was guilty because of "how he was sat" in the dock before they even knew what the charges were. Well that and the defendant was Asian and the three jurors which made racial comments during the consideration.
For example, a woman hires a hitman to kill her husband; the prosecution are likely to convict if they can prove and/or demonstrate a) she paid him, b) he was known by her to be a hitman when she paid him and c) there was motive for her to want her husband dead.
With this case, if it goes to trial, the prosecution will have to prove
a) he is a sexual predator, and establish a "pattern of behaviour" to convince jurors of this - this goes to motive
b) this wasn't "fantasy", i.e. he was specifically planning the crime with an intended victim in mind, and the police have evidence of this (text messages, taped phone calls, anecdotal evidence)
c) that the witnesses are credible. The defence will argue that he sleeps with a lot of women and uses them for one night stands (not illegal) and this naturally upsets the young slappers (not illegal) - so they make up all kinds of malicious lies and allegations about him which have lead to this trial.
Stuff like those comments on that forum would never be allowed into the court by the judge as they are extremely prejudicial, could've been written by anyone with any motive and prove absolutely nothing.
Incidentally, I've never heard of the band or the singer, I'm just offering a little bit of balance to the outrageous witch hunt comments being posted by the neanderthals. Cheers.
PS. He has been CHARGED, which means the Police believe he has committed the crime and they, with the CPS, believe they have sufficient evidence to gain a conviction. The jury decide the rest. That is the legal system we have here but, if like Meade's Ball, you'd like the MEDIA or layman internet forums like this one to deliver 'justice', who am I to argue with your beliefs.
I recently sat on a jury which was deadlocked 8-3 in favour of acquittal in a conspiracy case which was, to be fair, a f***ing farce. Unfortunately, the three who were finding "guilty" said they thought he was guilty because of "how he was sat" in the dock before they even knew what the charges were. Well that and the defendant was Asian and the three jurors which made racial comments during the consideration.
For example, a woman hires a hitman to kill her husband; the prosecution are likely to convict if they can prove and/or demonstrate a) she paid him, b) he was known by her to be a hitman when she paid him and c) there was motive for her to want her husband dead.
With this case, if it goes to trial, the prosecution will have to prove
a) he is a sexual predator, and establish a "pattern of behaviour" to convince jurors of this - this goes to motive
b) this wasn't "fantasy", i.e. he was specifically planning the crime with an intended victim in mind, and the police have evidence of this (text messages, taped phone calls, anecdotal evidence)
c) that the witnesses are credible. The defence will argue that he sleeps with a lot of women and uses them for one night stands (not illegal) and this naturally upsets the young slappers (not illegal) - so they make up all kinds of malicious lies and allegations about him which have lead to this trial.
Stuff like those comments on that forum would never be allowed into the court by the judge as they are extremely prejudicial, could've been written by anyone with any motive and prove absolutely nothing.
Incidentally, I've never heard of the band or the singer, I'm just offering a little bit of balance to the outrageous witch hunt comments being posted by the neanderthals. Cheers.
PS. He has been CHARGED, which means the Police believe he has committed the crime and they, with the CPS, believe they have sufficient evidence to gain a conviction. The jury decide the rest. That is the legal system we have here but, if like Meade's Ball, you'd like the MEDIA or layman internet forums like this one to deliver 'justice', who am I to argue with your beliefs.
Garage_Doors
Originally the Swankers
Exactly, your not.
- Oct 17, 2008
- 14,606
Are you, then, suggesting a root and branch revolution of the criminal justice system?
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Thanks for that Rumpole.
And there was me thinking that a thread on NSC could be submitted by the prosecution as evidence in a nonce trial.
Garage_Doors
Originally the Swankers
I'm not suggesting anything.
I'm agreeing with you that your not in a position to argue with others beliefs.
