8/231
H Hatterlovesbrighton something clever Jul 28, 2003 4,543 Not Luton! Thank God Aug 12, 2011 #42 If Sussex were winning lots then Monty would get more credit.
L Left Footer Well-known member Sep 26, 2007 1,853 Shoreham Aug 12, 2011 #43 Good to see Nash taken a wicket for the Lions, reasonable 28 and now 1-9 off 3 overs.
Cantona's Flying Dropkick vidi vici veni Jul 5, 2003 9,212 Mike C Gull's pad in Hassocks Aug 12, 2011 #44 255/9 Last edited: Aug 12, 2011
Cantona's Flying Dropkick vidi vici veni Jul 5, 2003 9,212 Mike C Gull's pad in Hassocks Aug 12, 2011 #45 311 ao Sussex require 337
Cantona's Flying Dropkick vidi vici veni Jul 5, 2003 9,212 Mike C Gull's pad in Hassocks Aug 12, 2011 #46 The chase started - 16/1 Gatting
Cantona's Flying Dropkick vidi vici veni Jul 5, 2003 9,212 Mike C Gull's pad in Hassocks Aug 12, 2011 #47 17/1 stumps day 3
Knightsworld Well-known member Aug 19, 2003 6,948 WSU, just below the seagull. Aug 13, 2011 #50 Sussex 125/4 (40.0 ov) Sussex require another 212 runs with 6 wickets remaining LUNCH
H HAILSHAM SEAGULL Well-known member Nov 9, 2009 10,359 Aug 13, 2011 #53 Muzza 103 no, 229-5, 108 required
G Gwylan Well-known member Jul 5, 2003 31,830 Uffern Aug 13, 2011 #54 Brown out now That looks curtains for us
H HAILSHAM SEAGULL Well-known member Nov 9, 2009 10,359 Aug 13, 2011 #55 Still got big Kirk, he batted well 1st innings, poor shot selection by Brown, trying to sweep Ajmal and right before tea.
Still got big Kirk, he batted well 1st innings, poor shot selection by Brown, trying to sweep Ajmal and right before tea.
A Andrew New member May 15, 2008 3,002 Sussex Aug 13, 2011 #56 104 to win with 4 wickets still in hand
B BHAFC_AMEX New member Feb 5, 2011 643 Aug 13, 2011 #58 Forget the cricket, has no one else noticed that the title of the thread is wrong. Shouldn't it be 'Liverpool' and not 'London' Victoria
Forget the cricket, has no one else noticed that the title of the thread is wrong. Shouldn't it be 'Liverpool' and not 'London' Victoria