Withdean Wanderer
Banned
He's only made a few sub appearances because he is not good enough to command a regular first team place, sometimes not even a spot on the bench.
Hasn't stopped people claiming Fraser is the new Makelele
He's only made a few sub appearances because he is not good enough to command a regular first team place, sometimes not even a spot on the bench.
He's only made a few sub appearances because he is not good enough to command a regular first team place, sometimes not even a spot on the bench.
Hasn't stopped people claiming Fraser is the new Makelele
Don't think it works like that to be honest. The people who obsess about Fraser are nearly the same as the people who glorify the minimal contribution of Doug Loft. Fraser gets praise because he has put in some good performances for the first team. Of course he has looked shit as well at times, but there is at least POTENTIAL there. One the Loft-lovers remove their rose-tinted specs, surely they will realise that this is one thing Loft just ain't got.
You haven't got a f***ing clue. How can you say a 22 year old, who's made some impressive performances away from home, and has been good for the reserves all season, has NO potential at all?
FACT - Loft has had his best games away from Withdean, and therefore many haven't seen the best of him.
I don't think he's Ronaldo - but he's certainly not complete lost cause.
Just as a final disagreement - i'd go as far as saying it's the same posters who hate loft that LOVE Fraser.
That's a VERY broad generalisation, but yeah if it strengthens your argument. I didn't say Loft completely lacks potential, but he has shown nothing to suggest that he is as good as Fraser is. He has obviously put in some good performances for the reserves and sometimes when he has come on, he hasn't been THAT bad. However, no matter what he is on, using Wilkins' logic of getting rid of Reid, Butters, Martot (who all could have had another year IMO), surely Loft should go as well. No matter what his potential is, he clearly hasn't come any closer to the first team and has been given 2 years to do exactly that. Surely this has to stop some time.
but Martot was never our player, he has been on loan and if you believe the Argus is off to top flight French football. Reid all though a shame would be on a far better wage and would want first team football maybe something Wilkins couldn't offer him + the injuries in the last few years. Agree about Butters think a player/coach role would have been perfect
You haven't got a f***ing clue. How can you say a 22 year old, who's made some impressive performances away from home, and has been good for the reserves all season, has NO potential at all?
FACT - Loft has had his best games away from Withdean, and therefore many haven't seen the best of him.
I don't think he's Ronaldo - but he's certainly not complete lost cause.
Just as a final disagreement - i'd go as far as saying it's the same posters who hate loft that LOVE Fraser.
but Martot was never our player, he has been on loan and if you believe the Argus is off to top flight French football.
Loft has been given three years to prove himself and he's .... played well in a couple of away games. Fraser ain't brilliant but he's way better than Loft. Loft has been woeful when he's played at the Withdean ..truly woeful.
As for the reserves ... well gatting played well in the reserves but it hasn't transformed into first team performances.
This is about football ability not a fashion parade or how nice a player is.
Loft has been given three years to prove himself and he's .... played well in a couple of away games. Fraser ain't brilliant but he's way better than Loft. Loft has been woeful when he's played at the Withdean ..truly woeful.
As for the reserves ... well gatting played well in the reserves but it hasn't transformed into first team performances.
This is about football ability not a fashion parade or how nice a player is.
thats a rubbish comparison. reid is meant to be at the peak of his career at the moment and has spent the best part of 2 years injured. he won't be one of the cheaper players regarding wages methinks.
loft is a young fringe player and as such is likely to be on a small wage?
they clearly see some potential in him and therefore worth a punt.[/QUOTE]
There is no potential there.
The same is still being said about Gatting. When will Wilkins realise Gatting is shite and good enough for a conference side (if he's lucky).
It really doesn't matter how cheap he is, he will never make the grade in League 1 so paying him anything is a waste of money. He's conference at best, and that's probably being generous. If you haven't broken into the 1st team in 3 years, you never will, so this is totally pointless!
then why do we still have sullivan, chamberlain and fogden?
it took hammond a fair while from his debut to break into the first team
comparing loft to fraser is ridiculous - fraser is a defensive minded player who sits back and offers very little going forward. loft is a midfield player who looks to get forward, and when he comes on can be very creative and have an influence on changing a game - as he showed at hartlepool when he won the ball back and got the assist for savages goal, cheltenham when he scored himself to get us out of jail, and luton when he was used as a striker. like robinson, he has got to start doing it more consistently though, as opposed to coming off the bench every now and again and looking like a very good player
my guess is that he has been kept because he is different to all of our other central players, in that most of them seem naturally more defensive, while he is more attack minded.
if we were in a losing situation and needed a midfielder to come off the bench and change the game for us, i would go for loft everytime over fraser