The Large One
Who's Next?
Gus h a legal team presumably to represent him does he not? Is Bevan a lawyer?
Bevan is one of Gus' chosen represenatives. I'd have said it was wise to have a football person with him.
Gus h a legal team presumably to represent him does he not? Is Bevan a lawyer?
Bevan is one of Gus' chosen represenatives. I'd have said it was wise to have a football person with him.
Maybe the statement was put out by the LMA because of the negative feeling towards Gus that the clubs statement had been generating. (possibly unintentionally, and because of wild speculation, something we'd been ask to avoid doing)
Looking at the views on the other thread on the clubs statement, many were assuming it was Gus looking to drag it out, looking to get more money, etc and all the other speculative reasons which was making him look like the villain in the whole affair, so of course he is going to get his representatives to put out a statement to try to balance things up again.
It shows you shouldn't jump to conclusions (like so many did on that thread) until you hear both sides of the story.
Why, the have produced the docs to support their case, with 500 pages in support.......tin pot would have been on the back of a fag packet.........its called doing a thou rough job.
With a new Ass Director of Football, until his contract runs out.If indeed it proves there is no case to answer and Gus is cleared by his legal team, where an earth does this leave us ?
Absolute shambles. Talk about misplaced sense of importance from Barber and the board... what the **** does Gus care about this completely pointless 'suspension', he's leaving anyway. Whoever handled this sorry episode is operating way out of their pay bracket. it could and should have been resolved weeks back with a little pragmatism, i'm sure both parties could have agreed a deal if one party (the club) hadn't tried to act tough.
If Bevan is a lawyer or not is irrelevant , if Bevan however is a representative of the LMA is totally relevant
Bevan is one of Gus' chosen represenatives. I'd have said it was wise to have a football person with him.
Absolutely, take a football man and a legal man. Surely anybody in a similar situation would want to be represented in the best way possible
I could understand a union man being present if Gus didn't fully know his rights in this, but after 5 weeks and presumably now in the hands of proper legal representatives one would think that this has gone beyond his union.
Bevan needing to being there is just window dressing.
Gus's team appear to be stalling. Worryingly, he doesn't seem to be acting like a man intent on starting another managerial job anytime soon.
Love to know how you came to that conclusion.
They received their case on 13 June. Before today, that's two working days to defend a case that took four weeks to put together.
5 weeks on and still not closer to finding a genuine breach of contract, then demanding he be in a day or so after sending a 500 page document. Retarded.
Doesn't sound like the club are handling things as well as we thought.
It said they received it recently, no date given.
It was particularised on the 13th which I think is just a summary of the charges, which they would have already known from the initial report.
Particularised means the particulars of the charges ie. the details. It most certainly isn't a summary.
It means they want the specifics,i.e the main points. They would have had the long winded version before the 13th.
Sorry but I work with lawyers. It doesn't mean that.
It looks like the club aren't handling this as well as they would like. For heavens sake, not even abiding by your own employee handbook. That's basic stuff. As for the spin spin spin and leak leak leak going on too...