Deportivo Seagull
I should coco
He writes exactly as you’d expect
His parents must have spent (at todays prices) in the region of £200k on his education. I think they should look for a refund as, quite frankly, they’ve been ripped off.
He writes exactly as you’d expect
Oh, it was a question, and even featured a question mark. But it was a loaded question, which is something entirely different from a genuine question which seeks knowledge and/or understanding.Bollocks. My post was a question, niot a comment, so by definition cannot be 'incorrect'.
Still bollocks - or maybe clutching at straws. Can't make up my mind - and ain't going to waste my time worrying about which it is.Oh, it was a question, and even featured a question mark. But it was a loaded question, which is something entirely different from a genuine question which seeks knowledge and/or understanding.
You know it's going to feature Kwasi and it's titled Weak Pound.
Apparently Braverman sent messages asking recipients of her compromised correspondence to delete it. So, she knew what she'd done.It seems like Liz Truss having her phone so completely hacked by a foreign power that security services had to lock it away in a lead bunker and the PM doing his best to cover it up should be a treasonable offence in any normal country but what do I know.
Can we trust any of the current Government with electronic devices?
Opening new Pork markets, surely?You know it's going to feature Kwasi and it's titled Weak Pound.
hang on, being hacked is not on the person hacked, they are the victim of that attack. the "completely hacked" and "locking away" makes it sound a bit of a tabloid inflated story anyway. with SIM removed its just a anonymous phone, passed to police/MI5 for forensic investigation.It seems like Liz Truss having her phone so completely hacked by a foreign power that security services had to lock it away in a lead bunker and the PM doing his best to cover it up should be a treasonable offence in any normal country but what do I know.
Can we trust any of the current Government with electronic devices?
It depends what was hacked. If it was a government issued & secured device I’d agree.hang on, being hacked is not on the person hacked, they are the victim of that attack. the "completely hacked" and "locking away" makes it sound a bit of a tabloid inflated story anyway. with SIM removed its just a anonymous phone, passed to police/MI5 for forensic investigation.
so all the victims of the phone hacking scandal are responsible for being hacked, not News International? think about what you're saying.It depends what was hacked. If it was a government issued & secured device I’d agree.
If she was using a personal phone then I’m afraid it is on her
I’m talking about an individual with an cabinet position with specific policies as to which devices are used and how for this exact reason.so all the victims of the phone hacking scandle are responsible for being hacked, and not in fact News International? think about what you're saying.
time well spentStill bollocks - or maybe clutching at straws. Can't make up my mind - and ain't going to waste my time worrying about which it is.
Who do you think is better able to secure their phone?so all the victims of the phone hacking scandal are responsible for being hacked, not News International? think about what you're saying.
They had their voicemail hacked. That doesn't result in locking your phone in a safe. If you are hacked as you think you are a millionth visitor to a website, it is on you. You are making some pretty broad assumptions that she has been the victim of some CSI/Mission Impossible stuff.so all the victims of the phone hacking scandal are responsible for being hacked, not News International? think about what you're saying.