Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Liz Truss **RESIGNS 20/10/2022**









Audax

Boing boing boing...
Aug 3, 2015
3,268
Uckfield
The MPs failed to make a clear choice. More fool them. 38% backed Sunak.

Sunak 137, Truss 113, Mordaunt 105.

To be honest, this whole thing of the party leader being picked by the entire membership strikes me as stupid and recipe for disaster anyway. As much as I'm a democracy proponent, when it comes to picking the parliamentary party leader IMO it should be entirely within the hands of the MPs. Given that MPs are the ones with the power to create a leadership spill in the first place, you want to be sure the new leader has the backing of the MPs they'll be leading. I suspect if it had gone to MPs voting between Sunak and Truss, Sunak would have won - and not by a small amount.
 




Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,929
West Sussex
To be honest, this whole thing of the party leader being picked by the entire membership strikes me as stupid and recipe for disaster anyway. As much as I'm a democracy proponent, when it comes to picking the parliamentary party leader IMO it should be entirely within the hands of the MPs. Given that MPs are the ones with the power to create a leadership spill in the first place, you want to be sure the new leader has the backing of the MPs they'll be leading. I suspect if it had gone to MPs voting between Sunak and Truss, Sunak would have won - and not by a small amount.

If MPs who wanted Sunak voted for Mordaunt, then they only have themselves to blame.
 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
To some of their backers and enablers, scorched earth is certainly the plan. The hedge fund owners, environmental vandals, ERG nationalists and hostile foreign powers, this is the blooming of years of their work

But Truss and Kwarteng aren't in on it, despite what the book says. They are just useful idiots. They are there to take the lightning bolts

indeed, it's genuinely scary
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,953
Surrey
been tried. doesnt work out so well, ask Russia or Venezuela. China is having a good go at it though, now they merged with market dynamics.
I do dislike it when right wing Europeans point at Venezuela as some sort of proof that socialism doesn't work. Your sort are always more reluctant to point out the success of Bolivia which has drastically cut extreme poverty and has the highest GDP growth rate in South America.

Or you could just ignore poorer South American countries entirely and instead look at a multitude of European nations similarly wealthy to ours, that have adopted socialist principles at various points over the past 2 or 3 decades with various degrees of success. It's just nonsense to say it doesn't work out so well. Of course it does if it is done competently. Not unlike free-market economies really. The point here is that we have been hopelessly mismanaged for at least 6 years now, and this has compounded the much-publicised larger problems that are out of our government's control.
 








Audax

Boing boing boing...
Aug 3, 2015
3,268
Uckfield
If MPs who wanted Sunak voted for Mordaunt, then they only have themselves to blame.

I think the point I was making is they *didn't* vote for Truss. And, IMO, if faced with a binary choice where Mordaunt wasn't an option, more of them would have voted Sunak than Truss.
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,025
Or you could just ignore poorer South American countries entirely and instead look at a multitude of European nations similarly wealthy to ours, that have adopted socialist principles at various points over the past 2 or 3 decades with various degrees of success. It's just nonsense to say it doesn't work out so well. Of course it does if it is done competently. Not unlike free-market economies really. The point here is that we have been hopelessly mismanaged for at least 6 years now, and this has compounded the much-publicised larger problems that are out of our government's control.

when we look at European nations we have to include our own, we're all in same mixed market economy model, with aspects of state provision to differing amounts. i assume when some one wants a socialist government they want to go further, state intervention into general business and industry, otherwise they're just asking for a alteration on the present. i like to bring up the Venezula example, because it was held up by many socialist as a fine example (visits by Corbyn and fellow travellers), had so much going for it, utterly failed to deliver and impoverished its people. i also like to bring up the successful socialist country, China, because its done so by embracing markets, entrepreneurship, while maintaining the ugly side of state control. i dont see a socialist and liberal country, though i'll look at Bolivia.
 




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,778
If MPs who wanted Sunak voted for Mordaunt, then they only have themselves to blame.

So once the MPs cut it down to the two, who did you vote for. I remember you saying you had no idea, so which way did you go, or did you abstain ?

And no aftertiming :wink:
 






Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Disagree. There's no way they were expecting this to pan out the way it has. They're in the Conservative Party too, the longest-lasting -- and along with the GOP -- most effective, and most powerful electoral force across the globe.
They're ideologues. They actually believe this. They aren't trying to scorch our earth -- even if that is the outcome. They think it will lead to sunny uplands.
It'll be interesting to see what those in the party do, here's one response from one former MP:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/29/tory-mp-truss-kwarteng-labour

Oh yes, they are. Scorched earth is exactly what they are doing. Truss admires Patrick Minford

[tweet]1550057006714740739[/tweet]
 












Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here