Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,086
I realise this doesn't belong here, but as this is the home of 'Webster not good enough' - it does rather fit right in.
[tweet]1183661610667331584[/tweet]
No it doesn't belong here, and neither does this comment..
Of all the other 14 tables comparing the top performing players, I think I have only seen 1 mention of a Palace player.
And yet they stand 6th in the table..
Must all be down to Hodgson's work on Systems and shapes ( I think that was what [MENTION=25756]Se20[/MENTION] attributed it to).
Certainly no luck involved.