Seasider78
Well-known member
- Nov 14, 2004
- 6,011
I'd keep an UNCHANGED team, NO reason to TINKER
Agree with this cannot see CH changing the side that has gone on this run because of one performance
I'd keep an UNCHANGED team, NO reason to TINKER
Ahh. Baldock defends from the front, is that pundit talk, because its drivel. You said it, Wilson is more likely to score a goal and thats what we want. Lets get the early goals and make them have to come at us,
Stockdale
Bruno Goldson Greer Rosenior
Skalak Stephens Kayal Murphy
Hemed Wilson
I wouldn't be surprised to see Sidwell start instead of Murphy or Wilson, I think one winger would make a lot of sense and make things narrow in the midfield - but we need to be wary that a change to 3 central midfielders will be a change for us that we're not used to. Sticking with our 4-4-2 makes things more familiar for us and suits us better in my opinion, we have a better balance that way.
Whatever we do, we have the options off the bench if required.
I think we'll need to match them in midfield and so bring in Sidwell for Baldock for at least the first hour. I'd be happy to go into the final thirty minutes level as I think they will then get nervy. Also I think Derby today exposed our two central midfielders, especially in the second half. Kayal looked knackered. If Boro score early on we have very little chance. So for me, Sidwell for Baldock, Greer for Dunk. Then later on, Baldock or Wilson for Sidwell, Murphy for Skalak. It's going to be incredibly tough but a disaster if we concede early.Greer for Dunk
Murphy for Skalak
Wilson for Baldock
CH, do not allow us to get overun in midfield. Don't start Baldock, he doesn't have a top class goal in him.
Two changes. Greer for Dunk and Murphy for Skalak.
We did it at Hull and it worked pretty well, albeit we didn't score. I'd start 4-5-1 and go 442 in the last thirty minutes if we are level or behind.Stockdale
Bruno Goldson Greer Rosenior
Skalak Stephens Kayal Murphy
Hemed Wilson
I wouldn't be surprised to see Sidwell start instead of Murphy or Wilson, I think one winger would make a lot of sense and make things narrow in the midfield - but we need to be wary that a change to 3 central midfielders will be a change for us that we're not used to. Sticking with our 4-4-2 makes things more familiar for us and suits us better in my opinion, we have a better balance that way.
Whatever we do, we have the options off the bench if required.
Now that we have to go there for a win, I can't help thinking that I'd rather see a change in our attacking line up by bringing in Jamie Murphy for Baldock, but giving Knocky a free role behind Hemed and playing Murphy wide right. I genuinely think Knocky could cause Boro serious damage running at their defence from anywhere on the pitch while I think Murphy has a goal in him more than Baldock.
i'm sure it won't happen though and we'll be unchanged (apart from GG in for Dunk)
Greer for Dunk, Zamora to take GG's place on the bench.
How Forest won at Teeside: https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/9...hip-2015-2016-Middlesbrough-Nottingham-Forest