Why would that make you avoid the main thread? Are you worried about repercussions outside of NSC? If it’s just the thread, your views and ethnicity would be welcome - it’s been a really good debate.
My mother has one, also 12 but a working springer. Amazing animal and a real peoples dog, only just starting to real slow upSadly she is now completely deaf. She's 12 years old and has lost her spring. She loves swimming but would get in trouble quickly, head says yes body says no. At one point I had to reel her in. She still loves our swimming pool.
The only thing with her loving water my caravan stunk of wet dog for the week
Well thought out post.
As a matter of accuracy, Hamas is a prOscribed terrorist group, not a prEscribed one
Over 11 million people, over 6 million of them Jewish. A good chunk of the rest the sort of humanitarian leftist we seem intent on silencing .
Hey, I'm not oblivious to it. That Hitler has a lot to answer for
Although the idea of creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine, and the movement of jews to Palestine heavily predates WW2. That was just the catalyst to formalise it, and consequently, to raise tensions in the region.Its a thought experiment, I don't have all the answers. But hey, the western US is quite desert-y. And there's more jews in the US than in Israel. Might have been a perfect match.
Great picture.
Hey, I'm not oblivious to it. That Hitler has a lot to answer for
Its a thought experiment, I don't have all the answers. But hey, the western US is quite desert-y. And there's more jews in the US than in Israel. Might have been a perfect match.
Anyway I also thought that it was a consequence of WW2, turns out that moving to Palestine was first mooted in 1839 and agreed by the European powers in 1920.
Palestine also wasn't the only option on the table. As lifted from Wikipedia:
After a wave of pogroms in Russia, Joseph Chamberlain offered Theodor Herzl the establishment of a Jewish state in Uganda, East Africa.[17] In 1903 Herzl presented the British Uganda Programm at the Sixth Zionist Congress in Basel.[18]
The Jewish Autonomous Oblast, set up in the Russian Far East in 1934, represented a Soviet approach to providing a Jewish homeland. Another possible option explored by the Soviets was Jewish autonomy in Crimea.
In the late 1930s, the British Zionist League considered a number of other places where a Jewish homeland could be established. The Kimberley region in Australia was considered until the Curtin government (in office 1941–45) rejected the possibility.[19]
With the support of the then Premier of Tasmania, Robert Cosgrove (in office from 1939), Critchley Parker proposed a Jewish settlement at Port Davey, in south west Tasmania.[20] Parker surveyed the area, but his death in 1942 put an end to the idea.
a plan for Jews to settle the Sitka area in Alaska, the Slattery Report, was proposed by U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt's Secretary of the Interior Harold L. Ickes in 1939 but turned down
So there you go, Alaska. I've learnt something today.
Agreed. I have to say that there are two separate issues at hand here. And it seems the government, like much of the press, are fusing them together. As a person who throughout his life has had an affection, respect and also intrigue towards the Jewish race it irks me. I was once accused of being a 'ranging anti-Semite' for raising deep miss-givings about some factions of Zionist doctrine. That was deeply offensive to me as I am quite the opposite.
Excellent book
I’m referring to shit stirring right wingers, there’s a couple, one in particular, and with respect a blind man can see which one I’m talking about.
But it is still legal to say that Braverman is
Come off it.
).
