Leeds or Chelsea

[junior]

LEEDS.




Should this not have been a POLL?

 

[Les Biehn]

Chelski.....vile plastic (unts

Interesting coming from someone whose team have just aquired their own sugar daddy and were part of one of the most dubious transfer situation ever involving a professional Kev the Ape look-a-like and his mate.

 

[Strike]

Don't like either.

 

[Simster]

Surely it's Chelsea? They're TWATS and always have been.

 

[FalmerforAll!**]

Chelsea SCUM

 

[Braders]

I LIKE Leeds 'cause they hate United
I LIKE Chelsea (family thing) 'cause they hate United

I HATE United

 

[bhaexpress]

Am not too bothered about Leeds as having worked there in the past the locals are okay, Ken Bates does given me some feeling of revulsion. However I depise Chelsea and their plastic fans with a vengeance.

 

[Silent Bob]

Everyone would - thats a fact.

People that say they dont want whats happened to Pompy or Reading is either a liar or a fool

erm, why exactly?

Reading yes, they are a perfect example of what a club in our position is capable of.

Portsmouth, no, I'd rather support a shit team than a team with no soul.

 

[Nemesis]

I frigging hate them BOTH in equal amounts. Always have, always will.

 

[Braders]

weird this one should pop up on a day when we've been thanking every club for supporting us innit

 

[Starry]

Surely it's Chelsea? They're TWATS and always have been.

You're not wrong.

 

[Wozza]

I love all this Chelsea hating. People seem to feel that Arsenal, United and Liverpool are royalty so overlook the fact that they are just as bad as Chelsea. It's like the national consiousness has been altered to find certain behaviour acceptable or tolerable from these 3 compared to other clubs, especially any that can play their game, i.e Chelsea.

Yes yes, but you're a CHELSEA FAN.

 

[itszamora]

The thing which for me separates Chelsea from other teams with rich backers is their complete and utter classnessness, examples being with us over the stadium, the Ashley Cole affair and of course the story they came up with after getting rid of William Gallas claiming he'd said he'd score own goals if ever picked for Chelsea again.

 

[Uncle Buck]

The way Les is standing up for Chelsea you would think he supports them.

 

[Badger]

If United were included in this then I would vote for them hands down, it's not so much the team (apart from that twat Ronaldo and Ferguson of course) it's there annoying fans most of whom have no reason to support them in the first place.

Leeds and Chelsea.....I think it would have to be Chelsea, Leeds can just be laughed at now

 

[Superphil]

I hate Palace, is that wrong?

I laugh at teams like Leeds ending up in the third division.
I laugh at teams like Chel$ea when they fail to win the league, the CL and all the cups with the amount of money they have spent.

As we all know full well, most of the fans are simply that, fans, and in many cases they always have been.

For the neuvo Chelski fans, just snigger in the knowledge that they are having to fork out for new Man U shirts now. If only they made reversible ones with Man U on one side and Chelsea on the other, then their shirts might last more than 2 seasons.

But I hate Palace.

 

[C1 BHA]

Leeds are just scum. Their fans really are sub-primate level.
People from there also tend to be inherently dislikeable.

Very well said

 

[Superphil]

it's there annoying fans most of whom have no reason to support them in the first place.

Isn't it about time we recognised that Man U have a pretty sensational fanbase. And a huge proportion of thier season ticket holders come from within the Manchester region. Their season ticket prices in some areas of OT are lower than ours, they don't squeeze out their loyal fans. Teams like Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal etc could only dream of having that much local loyalty.
I am no Man U fan, but I have respect for most of what they have acheived. They have grown their own players, they have made their own money, they have won the Champions League, with eleven players from the UK in the squad. I can't imagine the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal or Liveroppol acheiving those things in the near future.
Sure they have a lot of fans from all over the UK and the World, in thier case that is a testament to their influence over many many years. Their worst average home attendance in modern times is over 36000. I went to see Chelsea about 20 years ago with a crowd of less than 8000 for a first division match.
I just think that we should drop the persistant slagging of Man U fans.

*prepares for severe flaming*

 

[Tesco in Disguise]

at a push, leeds.

 

[Braders]

Isn't it about time we recognised that Man U have a pretty sensational fanbase. And a huge proportion of thier season ticket holders come from within the Manchester region. Their season ticket prices in some areas of OT are lower than ours, they don't squeeze out their loyal fans. Teams like Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal etc could only dream of having that much local loyalty.
I am no Man U fan, but I have respect for most of what they have acheived. They have grown their own players, they have made their own money, they have won the Champions League, with eleven players from the UK in the squad. I can't imagine the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal or Liveroppol acheiving those things in the near future.
Sure they have a lot of fans from all over the UK and the World, in thier case that is a testament to their influence over many many years. Their worst average home attendance in modern times is over 36000. I went to see Chelsea about 20 years ago with a crowd of less than 8000 for a first division match.
I just think that we should drop the persistant slagging of Man U fans.

*prepares for severe flaming*

and fully deserved too.