Leeds or Chelsea

[Simster]

These two clubs really dislike each other.

However, like an awful lot of people I would imagine, I hate the f***ing pair of them. But the question is, who do you HATE the most.

For me, it's Chelsea. I absolutely hate those tin pot classless twats. Not a big club. f*** off.

 

[Gritt23]

Leeds, by a country mile!

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Leeds.

Racist, inbred, infighting thugs

 

[Trufflehound]

Hate Leeds more. Just tend to ignore Chelsea.

 

[DIFFBROOK]

Very hard to choose between them. But working in Leeds and having to hear their supports bleating on about how things are soooo bad and that they are still a massice club, I've got to go with Leeds.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Leeds

 

[Man of Harveys]

Ever since I witnessed their fans running riot in Brighton and since then calling out "niggers" at black people on the tube in London, Leeds. By a very big margin.

Don't get me wrong, Chelsea are an utterly, utterly foul money-laundering organisation presided over by c.untpipes of the highest degree and supported by a vast number of vegetative ugly neo-Nazis (I thought I was dreaming when I saw a number of them doing "sieg heil" salutes during God Save The Queen at Cardiff. I wasn't.). But one of my best mates supports them and he did even when they were shit so, pathetically, I just can't work up quite the same feeling detestation for them.

 

[jevs]

Chelski.....vile plastic (unts

 

[NMH]

Leeds are just scum. Their fans really are sub-primate level.
People from there also tend to be inherently dislikeable.

 

[Trigger]

Leeds.

 

[Les Biehn]

I love all this Chelsea hating. People seem to feel that Arsenal, United and Liverpool are royalty so overlook the fact that they are just as bad as Chelsea. It's like the national consiousness has been altered to find certain behaviour acceptable or tolerable from these 3 compared to other clubs, especially any that can play their game, i.e Chelsea.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

I love all this Chelsea hating. People seem to feel that Arsenal, United and Liverpool are royalty so overlook the fact that they are just as bad as Chelsea. It's like the national consiousness has been altered to find certain behaviour acceptable or tolerable from these 3 compared to other clubs, especially any that can play their game, i.e Chelsea.

I go along with that.

Man Utd are just upset they cant buy everyone and anybody they want anymore.

I dont think Man utd have spent that much less than Chelsea in past few years.

 

[SJ's Love Monkey]

Tough one but Chelsea get it for me, Nouveau twats

 

[Les Biehn]

I go along with that.

Man Utd are just upset they cant buy everyone and anybody they want anymore.

I dont think Man utd have spent that much less than Chelsea in past few years.

Between 20-30m on 4 players in recent memory and fair few around the 15m mark so I would guess not.

Also Liverpool, Arsenal and Man U are all part of the most self serving, elitist organisation in football, the G14.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Between 20-30m on 4 players in recent memory and fair few around the 15m mark so I would guess not.

Also Liverpool, Arsenal and Man U are all part of the most self serving, elitist organisation in football, the G14.

Smith - 7
evra - 7
rooney - 30
ferdinand -30
carrick - 18
ronaldo - 12
saha -12
heinze -6
Vidic - undic
park -udic

 

[Les Biehn]

Tough one but Chelsea get it for me, Nouveau twats

This is exactly what I'm talking about. No one seems to begrudge Portsmouth, Fulham, Aston Villa, Liverpool, Reading etc all having sugar daddies but Chelsea just happen to have the richest one and people are happy to accept the big 3 winning the league spending millions but not Chelsea.

What is better having a man come in and spend loads of his own money on a club or a man come in, put the club in a massive debt so he can buy it to make money?

I'm not condoning either, the whole thing is a disgrace but if you have a probelm with Chelsea you should have just as big a problem with the other 3 'big clubs'.

 

[Les Biehn]

Smith - 7
evra - 7
rooney - 30
ferdinand -30
carrick - 18
ronaldo - 12
saha -12
heinze -6
Vidic - undic
park -udic

What about Veron and Van Horseface as well?

 

[Dave the OAP]

This is exactly what I'm talking about. No one seems to begrudge Portsmouth, Fulham, Aston Villa, Liverpool, Reading etc all having sugar daddies but Chelsea just happen to have the richest one and people are happy to accept the big 3 winning the league spending millions but not Chelsea.

What is better having a man come in and spend loads of his own money on a club or a man come in, put the club in a massive debt so he can buy it to make money?

I'm not condoning either, the whole thing is a disgrace but if you have a probelm with Chelsea you should have just as big a problem with the other 3 'big clubs'.

i am not in the Liz Costa camp on this...if some millionaire russian wanted to spend a fortune on us and we ended up like Chelsea, I would die a happy man. BRING IT ON.


Oh L***s BTW

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Quite

like i said at least on par with Chelsea.

I dont really have a problem with them, much like I dont have a problem with Arsenal or Liverpool.

It just seems Man utd are rather bitter.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

i am not in the Liz Costa camp on this...if some millionaire russian wanted to spend a fortune on us and we ended up like Chelsea, I would die a happy man. BRING IT ON.


Oh L***s BTW

Everyone would - thats a fact.

People that say they dont want whats happened to Pompy or Reading is either a liar or a fool