This is how I feel about it. Sure there are probably people that dope, but it won't make a Messi out of a Harley.Maybe i'm being FAR too simplistic, but I've always assumed doping only really suits power sports. I.e RUNNING, CYCLING, ROWING, WEIGHT LIFITING. Of course a drug to improve a players individual power is beneficial, but it's still reliant on the 10 other players.
A footballer has to make hundreds of small decisions when on the ball. Which way to run, look up, assess the space, read the runs, do I play it long?, do I dribble, do I go for the return ball after playing it? etc etc. It's CONSTANT decision making.
Running and cycling (more running has less decisions to make as cycling) is purely run/peddle. It's a power boost.
No offence to the cylclists!
No doubt.As Lance has proved it's not just about steroids bulk up stronger job done, anymore.
That depends on the sport. In cycling the recovery in between stages is crucial. In football it's handy, but a Messi that hasn't fully recovered is still miles better than a fully fit Harley (or pretty much anyone else to be honest).There is as much importance in recovery from the activity and be ready for the next.
Same thing. A gifted footballer can be decent even if they're not the most dedicated in training, that's not the same in cycling.Not to mention being able to train longer.