Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Well was he at fault for the first goal or not ?
NSC decides
NSC decides
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Kuipers............
- Thread starter Beach Hut
- Start date
pasty
A different kind of pasty
No. Deflection left him no chance.
Taybha
Whalewhine
for once no.
Yes, deflection or not the ball was travelling at about two mph and he got his hand to it and couldn't keep it out. He needs to be dropped after that, if you make a mistake you need to be taken out of the team.
I'm awaiting TCBs defence of Kuipers, will be interesting how he explains this one.
I'm awaiting TCBs defence of Kuipers, will be interesting how he explains this one.
pasty
A different kind of pasty
May have something to do with his entire body weight going the other way.
BensGrandad
New member
Whilst neither could be described as his fault I would have expected him to have done better with both of them.
mcshane in the 79th
New member
- Nov 4, 2005
- 10,485
As above the deflection didn't help but there was no pace on it, he'd got down but just seemed to fumble it in
Garage_Doors
Originally the Swankers
From where i sat he looked at fault for both.
Look forward to seeing the replays.
Look forward to seeing the replays.
blue and white army
New member
Yeah he was shocking reflexes.
I know you've always had it in for Kuipers Beach Hut but there is far more to worry about than individual performances right now, the team is seemingly not performing like a team and any new additions that arrive to help are having their talent coached out of them by the 'coaching' team/dynamic duo.
He got his hands to it, he should save it. If it deflected past him then that is fine but it didn't it deflected at him at a really slow speed. I am neither a Kuipers fan or one of the people that want him dropped no matter what but that was a bad mistake.
Brighton M
Banned
Anyone who says no needs their f***ing eyes testing. the ball ROLLED over the line, and Kuipers once again blamed the defence like a twat.
Get the Jocko in.
Get the Jocko in.
bhamanandboy
New member
- Feb 17, 2008
- 158
i thought even though it was deflected he should have comfortably saved it.
Monsieur Le Plonk
Lethargy in motion
Dont think he was necessarily at fault for the first goal. By the same token, he is done and dusted as a keeper, even at this level. Instills no confidence in the crowd or the team. Whilst the latter is irrelevant, I'm afraid the latter is quite important. Had enough of him now.
FalmerforAll!**
NSC's Most Intelligent
For once, I'm going to confess that Kuipers was at fault. But to suggest that he's the weak link of a rusty chain right now is stupid. Far more important things to be worrying about than the goalkeeper at the moment, for a start, what about the joke back four that are supposed to be protecting him?
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,290
Slowest goal scored at Withdean since DougFuckingLoft's pitiful daisy-cutter consolation in the 5-1 drubbing v Stoke. THPP, he vote YES.
jordanseagull
Well-known member
- Feb 11, 2009
- 4,151
His fault this time.
- Aug 8, 2005
- 27,192
Big deflection but even so by his high standards and the fact he normally gets a very firm hand on that type of effort I guess you have to say he should have saved it.
However, it says a lot that this is the first time for a long long time that I can remember him getting a hand on a shot and not keeping it out.
However, it says a lot that this is the first time for a long long time that I can remember him getting a hand on a shot and not keeping it out.
S'hampton Seagull
Well-known member
I know there was a deflection, but the ball wasn't going that wide of him and should have saved it.