Do Belgium get a say in any of this?
The side that doesn't have Brazil and Germany.Given Brazil and Germany are far from form, what is the easier side of the draw?
don't really care who we play in the knock out stages tbh
anything could happen
as long as we don't lose on pens
that would be a sickener
After the experience of being pleased that we sorted an 'easier' draw against Iceland in Euro 2016, I would say keep on winning. However, a hard-fought draw against Belgium with us picking up a couple of bookings more, would maintain the momentum and still achieve the 'easier' route through.
By the time we kick off against Belgium, we will know who we play next in the event of a win or loss. Then we can decide whether to beat Belgium or not. It’s that simple.
By the time we kick off against Belgium, we will know who we play next in the event of a win or loss. Then we can decide whether to beat Belgium or not. It’s that simple.
Colombia looked superb against Poland. I think they would beat England.
The side that doesn't have Brazil and Germany.
Colombia looked superb against Poland. I think they would beat England.
What, like The Dell in 1978? Or do you think one side would make a positive start on the own goals?What if they're trying to do the same thing? Both teams setting out to lose could make for an interesting spectavle.
By the time we kick off against Belgium, we will know who we play next in the event of a win or loss. Then we can decide whether to beat Belgium or not. It’s that simple.
Brazil off form were held to a draw by Switzerland. They still didn't lose. I'd rather play Switzerland than Brazil. Form is temporary, class is permanent etc.Why though? Both are well off their form?
Obviously keep winning. To prove your the best you need to beat the best.
What, like The Dell in 1978? Or do you think one side would make a positive start on the own goals?