I never thought my column and its axing would produce such a heated debate. I re-iterate what I said yesterday in thanking eveyone for their support, apart from Lucky Boy Farang who go and play in the traffic, on the part of thread that London Irish has taken issue with I apologise if the point I was trying to make hasn't quite come across the way it should.
Creative writing, whatever the subject is very enjoyable and what I was trying to say in my heavily sub edited last column was that be it Pete Kennard, Roy Chuter, Paul Cammillin or whoever regardless of whether you have 'trained' as a journalist or not if your writing identifies with the readers or in the case of braodcasting the listeners, then you shouldn't be discriminated against because you are not in a union or have had conventional training.
The fanzine movement certainly broke down a lot of that discrimination but to a certain extent it still remains today, and that's what I was trying to convey.
Creative writing, whatever the subject is very enjoyable and what I was trying to say in my heavily sub edited last column was that be it Pete Kennard, Roy Chuter, Paul Cammillin or whoever regardless of whether you have 'trained' as a journalist or not if your writing identifies with the readers or in the case of braodcasting the listeners, then you shouldn't be discriminated against because you are not in a union or have had conventional training.
The fanzine movement certainly broke down a lot of that discrimination but to a certain extent it still remains today, and that's what I was trying to convey.