So by the same token I can blame the conservatives for invading Iraq because Labour had a big majority back then and didn't have credible opposition
Absolutely!
Although you were probably at school then.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
So by the same token I can blame the conservatives for invading Iraq because Labour had a big majority back then and didn't have credible opposition
Let’s concentrate on sorting out the corrupt government we have in power now.
So by the same token I can blame the conservatives for invading Iraq because Labour had a big majority back then and didn't have credible opposition
If only we had a credible opposition [emoji1651]
The Queens Speech mentioning a " Free Internet "... surely that's bloody ridiculous? Or, it used to be
Of course.I assume not in the "bad Jeremy Corbyn free internet" way?
So what, in your eyes, would make for a "credible opposition". It's one thing to call for one, but it's pointless without articulating what exactly it is you want.
[tweet]1392083506260492288[/tweet]
Today’s announcements, very much including the omitted topics such as worker’s rights, are very concerning. Anyone that isn’t worried about the direction this government are steering the U.K. clearly doesn’t understand what is going on. These are huge strides towards a one party state, immune from legal recourse . Not good. Not good at all. This is not democracy.
81 seat majority suggests otherwise, get over yourself wokery pokery and flakey libralism have been rejected
Regards
DF
Would it be possible to rename this, the Hysterical Fannies thread?
Would it be possible to rename this, the Hysterical Fannies thread?