- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,751
Well ?
An ex-PM. It is a reminder that -- however difficult it is to understand the UK's constitutional arrangements are -- we live in a parliamentary democracy and, of those two terms, it's the latter that's more questionable.A public evisceration of a PM by his peers. Amazing really. No idea if it is harsh or not, but they have clearly done all they can to get rid of the clown and keep him out.
Totally agree.As the PM at the time and repeatedly and deliberately misleading parliament, I'd consider it lenient.
Yeah, poor 'Boris'. Maybe we should start a GoFundMe to help him with yet another holiday to make him feel a bit better about the nasty people saying horrible things about him, when all he was doing was forgetting the rules of a global pandemic that he and his government had created and put in place. An easy mistake to make – we've all been there.It's all so unimportant and irrelevant right now. Leave the bloke alone. The only important thing is to get this enquiry finished so that we don't make the same stupid mistakes again - for example lockdowns, face masks, social distancing.
You do realise that what we are talking about is the Privileges Committee enquiry, an independent enquiry set up by Parliament to see whether Johnson repeatedly lied in Parliament, the majority of whose members were conservatives and who's chair Harriet Harman never got to vote as they decided on the result unanimously, so the chair had no vote, despite the lies stating otherwise from Johnson. (The lies about the committee report, as oppose to the lies about the lies that he told to Parliament, specifically about lying about parties).It's all so unimportant and irrelevant right now. Leave the bloke alone. The only important thing is to get this enquiry finished so that we don't make the same stupid mistakes again - for example lockdowns, face masks, social distancing.
Leave the bloke alone? He was all about "waiting for the outcome of the inquiry" when it suited him to dodge questions about whatever he was in hot water over. Now we have the outcome of an inquiry into his conduct and we should just leave him alone? OK mate.It's all so unimportant and irrelevant right now. Leave the bloke alone.
Let's not leave the "bloke" aloneIt's all so unimportant and irrelevant right now. Leave the bloke alone. The only important thing is to get this enquiry finished so that we don't make the same stupid mistakes again - for example lockdowns, face masks, social distancing.
To give him time to put together a mature, measured, sensible, factual and detailed response, I should imagineBtw, How was he able to get hold of the report a week early and thus being able to weasel his way out by resigning?
That went well then....To give him time to put together a mature, measured, sensible, factual and detailed response, I should imagine
Let's not leave the "bloke" alone
I could substitute a few words for the italics
My view is he is a piece of scum who has fecked my country and my grandkids opportunities, Covid is a sideshow to what we will all suffer now and in the future.
And he will continue to have a load of thick accolytes who are either stupid or bastards - there is no middle ground.
So if I saw the "bloke" jogging in my town.......
I probably wouldn't leave him alone
This stocks idea might just have legs