Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Jermaine Jenas sacked…



Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,171
Faversham
I'm surprised at the lack of consistency

Huw Edwards treated with kid gloves (no pun intended), Jenas they came down like a ton of bricks

Racists
Shirly it means the BBC have learned from the dithering over Edwards?
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,171
Faversham
I’m with you on this old boy, if it was that cut and dried Talk Sport would have dropped him like a stone, not had him presenting one of the most traditionally listened to shows ( when we are all going home, hence drive time) within minutes/hours of his sacking breaking in the news, and it’s not happened overnight with the apparent due process by the Beeb yet TNT had him commentating on the opening game of the EPL🤷‍♂️

Even after he’d gone off air, the TS news bulletins were stilll leading with his soundbite about there being two sides of the story and him consulting solicitors.

Surely if he was that ‘banged too rights’, brief statement and then slink away.
I agree. (It happens!)

Unless the person is caught red handed doing something sackable, there should be a process beginning with suspension on full pay.
 




Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,871
I'm surprised at the lack of consistency

Huw Edwards treated with kid gloves (no pun intended), Jenas they came down like a ton of bricks

Racists
It's about as racist as Tony Bloom sacking Chris Hughton.

This is the BBC over-compensating. They did nothing about Edwards, they did nothing about the Strictly dancers, and then they, rightly, copped a huge amount of flack for their 'sweep it under the carpet' approach. In the current climate their level of tolerance for any sort of misbehaviour is zero - as Jenas has found out.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,171
Faversham
Was it dithering or was it actually finding the evidence on his hard drive?
That's a good point. I had only half an eye on the kerfuffle after the Edwards conviction because the usual suspects were using it as as a stick to beat the BBC with (boring), but assumed they had done something wrong to justify the late demanding of repayment of salary.

Having now checked the facts it seems there was no wrongdoing by the BBC and the criticism was indeed just more campaigning by the 'defund the BBC' gang.
 




DJ NOBO

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2004
6,819
Wiltshire
Wife standing by £190k Pa star
 


Wozza

Custom title
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
24,379
Minteh Wonderland
Jenas has been 'let go' by his agents too, apparently.

In other news, it's emerged (someone read on Wiki) that his das changed his surname from Genas by deed poll... just so his initials would be DJ. :lolol:
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,171
Faversham
It's about as racist as Tony Bloom sacking Chris Hughton.

This is the BBC over-compensating. They did nothing about Edwards, they did nothing about the Strictly dancers, and then they, rightly, copped a huge amount of flack for their 'sweep it under the carpet' approach. In the current climate their level of tolerance for any sort of misbehaviour is zero - as Jenas has found out.
I agree that this is clearly the perception, but as @Thunder Bolt has pointed out, it is almost certainly incorrect.

But it does mean that Jenas must have been caught with incontrovertible evidence to be summarily dismissed.
 


rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
4,988
I’m with you on this old boy, if it was that cut and dried Talk Sport would have dropped him like a stone, not had him presenting one of the most traditionally listened to shows ( when we are all going home, hence drive time) within minutes/hours of his sacking breaking in the news, and it’s not happened overnight with the apparent due process by the Beeb yet TNT had him commentating on the opening game of the EPL🤷‍♂️

Even after he’d gone off air, the TS news bulletins were stilll leading with his soundbite about there being two sides of the story and him consulting solicitors.

Surely if he was that ‘banged too rights’, brief statement and then slink away.
But Talksport have "dropped him like a stone".

 






Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I'm surprised at the lack of consistency

Huw Edwards treated with kid gloves (no pun intended), Jenas they came down like a ton of bricks

Racists
There is nothing consistent with the two scenarios. It turned out that Edwards was exchanging pictures with a youth who turned out to be of age.
Edwards also delayed things by attempting suicide so hospitalised.
Later, the police investigating the first scenario, uncovered something far more vile and sinister.

Jenas, as I understand it, and without getting Nsc into trouble, sent unsolicited and inappropriate texts to a colleague, where it is fairly obvious he is the sender.
 




mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,927
England
I'm surprised at the lack of consistency

Huw Edwards treated with kid gloves (no pun intended), Jenas they came down like a ton of bricks

Racists
Hard to have consistency on two completely different scenarios

But sure, let's go with racists
 




GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,188
Gloucester




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,199
Goldstone
To stop being the next one sacked, it helps these days to maintain a faultless online presence and not to ‘chase anything that moves’.

I don't think they need to be faultless. I assume he's done a bit more than flirt with (chase) someone.


The latter is tricky for many males! In the moment, unable to remember that a lucrative career is at stake.

I'm hoping most married men don't send unsolicited messages to colleagues. How about remembering that they've got a marriage at stake.


In any other era, blokes in power/fame got away with it or far, far worse. Accusers gaslit, ousted.

Progress!

Yep.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,199
Goldstone
Interesting point of view.

I assumed they had simply learned from the mistakes they made with Edwards, but perhaps you are right :shrug:

Wasn't the allegation against Huw that he'd paid an adult (who didn't work at the BBC) for photos? Whereas Jermaine has done something wrong to a fellow employee, who has complained? Maybe that's different?

Of course it came to light that Huw did far worse, but that wasn't known initially. And I agree that following the Huw mess, they're going to try and take a harder line.
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,023
with Edwards BBC were advised dismissal would be prejudical to any case. for Jenas they simply follow their policy with lower threashold for an internal complaint. they are completely different. and yes, this means minor misdemeanour in a company are treated more directly than criminal offenses, it's pretty standard though.
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here