bhaexpress
New member
To be honest I can't see much difference between Jade Goody and a Lottery winner, she just had the dumb luck to make money by being thick. Can hardly blame her for doing so.
I can certainly see this thread being bounced in a year's time, with this quote included in the post, yes.Let me make a little prediction.
After her death there will be an almighty punch up between the new low life husband and her mother. The money will be the key driver, but the kids will end up being caught in the middle. It will all end in tears.
the words pot and kettle spring to mind i do agree with the rest of your post though.The problem is that middle England jumps on racism as if it was the worst crime in the world, without paying due attention to the actual crime itself.
Only?
To be honest I can't see much difference between Jade Goody and a Lottery winner, she just had the dumb luck to make money by being thick. Can hardly blame her for doing so.
Well, no. But you could have blamed her even long before this for being one hell of a standard bearer for the fact that a chronic lack of any dignity whatsoever is a fairly defining characteristic of a great number of people in the public eye at the moment. Nothing praiseworthy there.
And to test this often-aired "she's getting what she can for her kids" argument, would pay per view coverage of her (sadly by their nature rather unpleasant) final death throes also be an acceptable way for her and hers to line their coffers further? Because what's being run in the press every day at the moment isn't at all far short of that IMHO.
Come On Laura don't be provcative for the sake of it. As a cancer 6 in a year is incredibly low that was the point I was making. Of course the 6 dying it is tragic. I thought that went WITHOUT saying. It seems you have used a flawed reason to have a pop as if to say 2 US posted that he think 6 people dying does not matter ". That is very childish. Grow up.
No, I think that saying "only" 6 people is wrong. Six people dying is 6 too many, and you're just devaluing women getting tested for a very very virulent cancer, and the people dying of it. I happen to have known someone who was very close to me who died of cervical cancer.
Stop with the victim complex. It makes you look small and pathetic.
no he isn't - in what way is he 'devaluing women getting tested for a very very virulent cancer ?
And I don't know where your statistics come from,........The Sun probably.
Was he ever proven to be a performance enhancing drug cheat or was that brushed under the carpet given his recovery from cancer?
Don't be ridiculous. Once famous people get cancer, they instantly become brave defiant fighters who are genetically incapable of ever doing or indeed ever having done anything wrong. Everyone knows that.
No, I think that saying "only" 6 people is wrong. Six people dying is 6 too many, and you're just devaluing women getting tested for a very very virulent cancer, and the people dying of it. I happen to have known someone who was very close to me who died of cervical cancer.
Stop with the victim complex. It makes you look small and pathetic.
Because what it looks like he's saying, is "well, only 6 people die every year - so what's the point."
An incredibly brave Woman, She has gone up 100 fold in my estimation.Oh by the way young women under 30 going to their GP's areasking for a cervical smear have gone uo 20%.
What the hell are you talking about. That is completely out of order and quite frankly MENTAL. Where I have said against Women getting tested, I stated it was good as more Women had got tested !. How on earth do you read my comments at devaluing Women !. What is the victim comment about me all about ?.You have gone too far this time and if you had any decency you would apologise.
You are an utter disgrace.