Peppermint Tea
Well-known member
- Aug 31, 2007
- 1,252
My error - it was the games he bet on “his team” to lose where he didn’t play.He did - he was betting on himself to score in some of them.
My error - it was the games he bet on “his team” to lose where he didn’t play.He did - he was betting on himself to score in some of them.
Given the guidelines give minimum penalties like this, it makes it more difficult to understand why it took so long to announce and activate the sanctions. I suggested in the other Toney thread that his guilty plea should have prompted an immediate announcement of a suspension of "minimum X duration". Knowing that the guidance they work to included minimums in it just makes me believe they should have done that even more. They knew already he was going to get a minimum 6 months, so he should have immediately been suspended for "a minimum 6 months plus an additional X months to be announced before the expiration of the initial 6 months".8.5 A further 15 of the 126 bets or instructions to bet were placed by Mr Toney to score in 9 different matches all of which he played in. All of those 15 bets or instructions to bet were initiated by Mr Toney at a time when it would not have been public knowledge that he was starting or playing in the fixture. (Column 6 of the Guidelines with a sports sanction range of 6 months to life suspension);
Yes, if he had played in those games a precedent has been set; 8 year ban and four months in prison! It quite possibly also meant missing out on a World Cup winner's medal for Peter Swan too.Bloody Ada, I assumed it would be bets not involving his team. Presuming he played in those games, then you're absolutely right - 8 months feels very skinny for betting on something he could have directly influenced. That's in the realms of insider trading/criminal activity.
EDIT: just seen that he DIDN'T play in any of those matches.
It doesn’t take much to whisper in a team mate’s ear encouraging them to ‘miss’ or allow the ball to go out of play.He wasn't actually playing in any of those matches, not that it makes it much better, but it is a caveat of sorts.
Always head over heart when it comes to betting. Sometimes there has been ridiculous value in betting against the Albion - Fulham and Everton paid out nicely this season at 5/1 as did Sheffield United away a couple of years ago for the home winBlimey, I can't even bet on Brighton to lose, and I don't even play for the club.
It doesn’t take much to whisper in a team mate’s ear encouraging them to ‘miss’ or allow the ball to go out of play.
How did he know he wasn’t going to play, if the team sheet is only issued one hour before kick off? Has this been thoroughly investigated?
Over 200 offences? I’m not sure addicts (if that’s what he is) feel shame as they are so driven.It did mention something specifically about doing it when his team (who he was on loan to) was playing against his parent club so he was ineligible. The other ones I presume he was injured. I do think it’s a bit far fetched to suggest he could influence his team mates to lose. I imagine he performed all his betting in secret and with a certain amount of shame.
Agree and so would I. If I was drug or alcohol tested by my employer I'd claim 'addiction' in mitigation.I'd get someone to say I was addicted too if it meant reducing the penalty by three months.
I totally understand gambling addiction, it's horrible. But this pattern of betting, mainly in games he was involved in or in games his side had an interest in, smacks of greed not addiction.
But if Spurs get in the timing of the banning will be overlooked surely?If Brentford get into Europe at the expense of Villa or Spurs, could this result in legal action as clearly Toney should have been banned months ago?
The team sheet may be issued to the ref, the other team and the media an hour before the game but the players know the starting XI etc a day or two before the game. So he’d know he wasn’t going to be involved (barring late injury and being drafted into the squad) on the Thursday or Friday.How did he know he wasn’t going to play, if the team sheet is only issued one hour before kick off? Has this been thoroughly investigated?
Yeah, I get that. It's always worth an insurance bet. Thinking about it, I did back against us getting promotion in 2017. I did it in the knowledge that if it didn't happen the following year's season ticket was paid for. It's making sure that the bet doesn't tip the balance in what I actually want as the outcome. My pay out would have been £750 but I still wanted the Albion to go up as if I hadn't taken it out. If I'd have gone much above that I would have been compromised.Always head over heart when it comes to betting. Sometimes there has been ridiculous value in betting against the Albion - Fulham and Everton paid out nicely this season at 5/1 as did Sheffield United away a couple of years ago for the home win
Over 200 offences? I’m not sure addicts (if that’s what he is) feel shame as they are so driven.