Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,132
Greater than Fred Perry?
IMO yes. The level that Murray is competing at is far more challenging than Perry's era.
Greater than Fred Perry?
IMO yes. The level that Murray is competing at is far more challenging than Perry's era.
It is all about how dominant you are in the era in which you play, together with the quality of the opposition. It may be that Murray has to compete with tougher andbetter competition than Perry did (or it may not be) but Perry won Wimbledon3 years in a row and he didn't need a fancy carbon fibre racquet to do it!
And the line-calling...
Well, that's because no one else had one!
I'd like to see how Murray and co. would cope with wooden framed cat-gut strung rackets, and the tennis-balls of that area. And the line-calling...