alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
I am quite capable of being concerned about more than one thing at a time.
you come across as bejng incapable of doing anything other than bending over and grabbing your ankles when it comes to muslims
I am quite capable of being concerned about more than one thing at a time.
sort of person who would be happy with an open door policy in this country as long as it didn't affect himyou come across as bejng incapable of doing anything other than bending over and grabbing your ankles when it comes to muslims
What a depressing thread.
Just out of interest, I have managed to find on the Home Office website a list of proscribed terrorist organisation, which is mostly about ISIL, Jihad etc, with a Basque country thing in there somewhere as well, and a few Irish organisations right at the end.
https://www.scribd.com/document/318729850/Proscribed-Terrorist-Organisations-UK-Home-Office-2016
But I can't find a list of banned political parties - "political" just brings it back to the Terrorist list.
Any ideas? and I am not trying to make any sort of point on this - just asking and curious.
How about at least 10 posts on football, a couple on the toughest creatures and a comment on a picture along the lines of Y,Y,N,Y,N, before a political thread can be started?
People "preaching" racial hatred and violence from a right-wing political point of view should be banned from doing so just as much as Muslim preachers who they condemn for preaching the same sort of stuff from the other side.
Don’t forget fish puns.
I'm guessing that it's because any proscribed political groups are de facto terrorist organisations. This list on Wiki looks pretty definitive and includes the PKK and Hizbollah, both are political parties. Also further down is a reference to National Action.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_Act_2000
I think the difficulty is that there appears to be some 'interesting' interpretations of what crosses the line into promoting hatred and violence and much more worryingly, people being banned/arrested before they've even started speaking for fear of them causing offence. The latter is a very slippery slope to all sorts of unintended consequences. It's basically thought-crime.
I loathe the likes of Asim Qureshi and Anjem Choudhary and everything they stand for but fully support their right to call for an Islamic Britain fully under Sharia Law as they both have done publicly - as long as they don't encourage anyone to violence. Likewise I also support Sinn Fein's right to keep campaigning for a united Ireland even though the sight of Gerry Adams turns my stomach. And the same goes for Tommy Robinson with whatever he's got to say. The fact that I will probably find most of what these people say as deeply offensive is my tough luck and the price I pay for living in what is still one of the most tolerant and peaceful countries in the world.
Free speech means you have the right to offend and the risk of being offended. We need to treasure this.
I think the difficulty is that there appears to be some 'interesting' interpretations of what crosses the line into promoting hatred and violence and much more worryingly, people being banned/arrested before they've even started speaking for fear of them causing offence. The latter is a very slippery slope to all sorts of unintended consequences. It's basically thought-crime.
I loathe the likes of Asim Qureshi and Anjem Choudhary and everything they stand for but fully support their right to call for an Islamic Britain fully under Sharia Law as they both have done publicly - as long as they don't encourage anyone to violence. Likewise I also support Sinn Fein's right to keep campaigning for a united Ireland even though the sight of Gerry Adams turns my stomach. And the same goes for Tommy Robinson with whatever he's got to say. The fact that I will probably find most of what these people say as deeply offensive is my tough luck and the price I pay for living in what is still one of the most tolerant and peaceful countries in the world.
Free speech means you have the right to offend and the risk of being offended. We need to treasure this.
you come across as bejng incapable of doing anything other than bending over and grabbing your ankles when it comes to muslims
sort of person who would be happy with an open door policy in this country as long as it didn't affect him
regards
DR
So he goes around publicly telling people not to trust Muslims and acts aggrieved when they object? Funny old world.
I think the difficulty is that there appears to be some 'interesting' interpretations of what crosses the line into promoting hatred and violence and much more worryingly, people being banned/arrested before they've even started speaking for fear of them causing offence. The latter is a very slippery slope to all sorts of unintended consequences. It's basically thought-crime.
I loathe the likes of Asim Qureshi and Anjem Choudhary and everything they stand for but fully support their right to call for an Islamic Britain fully under Sharia Law as they both have done publicly - as long as they don't encourage anyone to violence. Likewise I also support Sinn Fein's right to keep campaigning for a united Ireland even though the sight of Gerry Adams turns my stomach. And the same goes for Tommy Robinson with whatever he's got to say. The fact that I will probably find most of what these people say as deeply offensive is my tough luck and the price I pay for living in what is still one of the most tolerant and peaceful countries in the world.
Free speech means you have the right to offend and the risk of being offended. We need to treasure this.