Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Islam and the UK - can it ever work?



Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
London Irish said:


The event was excellently policed. The ideas of the Muslim fanatics will be beaten by the force of reason, not riot police :)
Really well policed. A large number of people breaking the law, so we ignore it. Brilliant policing of the highest standard. They should have just arrested them. They were breaking the law. It's life in prision for enciting someone to commit murder. What signal does send out-

"Look lads, if theres enough of you, then you wont do nothing".

Great attiude. There would have been a riot. Thats the type of people your dealing with. So do you really believe this wont lead to riots.

So what happens then if they start going to arrest them one by one as they say they plan to do, when/if they identify them. Each and every one of them they arrest, they'll 'offend' the other muslims in the area, and they're probably start a riot for each arrest they make. Only then will we see, just what a small minority of Musilms are involved then.

But then London Twatish, that views probably racist in your eyes.
 
Last edited:




Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
London Irish said:
That's right racist, deport 'em all, Hitler is proved right again.
WHAT THE f*** ARE YOU ON!!

Mr Burns said:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by London Irish
That's right racist, deport 'em all, Hitler is proved right again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




That reply was in answer to the post I re-posted right above this one. I orginally posted it fifteen minutes earlier.

This proves London irish's way. He takes on line from it, in this case-

'Only then will we see, just what a small minority of Musilms are involved then.' Third paragraph, last sentence.

And then posts an answer like that..........

It goes to proves, all he does is provokes. Never mind the issues, just try and belittle people:nono: :nono:
 
Last edited:


Mr Burns said:
Sorry I apologise, obviously I missed something, because the German people and the Jewish faith seemed to get on so well in WWII. My mistake. It happened . It was vile and should never be allowed to happen again, although obviously it has in certain parts of the world.
But obviously the german people and the Jewish faith could live with each in the thirties/forties. If you make me out to be vile for suggesting they couldn't, explain why so many Jews were slaughtered. Or should we pretend it didn't happen.
They were slaughted because civilised Germans allowed the cancer of racism and facism to eat them up, and a huge facist movement got into power. They weren't slaughtered because "races can't live together". That was Hitler's explanation for his crimes, and you are putting forward the same reasoning you f***ing scumbag.
 
Last edited:


Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
London Irish said:
They were slaughted because civilised Germans allowed the cancer of racism and racism to eat them up, and a huge facist movement got into power. They weren't slaughtered because "races can't live together". That was Hitler's explanation for his crimes, and you are putting forward the same reasoning you f***ing scumbag.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
 


WATFORD O

Banned
Jul 6, 2003
3,451
SW6
London Irish said:
They were slaughted because civilised Germans allowed the cancer of racism and racism to eat them up, and a huge facist movement got into power. They weren't slaughtered because "races can't live together". That was Hitler's explanation for his crimes, and you are putting forward the same reasoning you f***ing scumbag.



and dont forget hitler was a socialist like you........
 




Tom Bombadil

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2003
6,106
Jibrovia
Mr Burns said:

So what happens then if they start going to arrest them one by one as they say they plan to do, when/if they identify them. Each and every one of them they arrest, they'll 'offend' the other muslims in the area, and they're probably start a riot for each arrest they make.


And your evidence or this scenario is what exactly? You sound like John Bull copmplaining that the dark hordes are waiting to murder our women and rape us in our beds.
 








WATFORD O said:
and dont forget hitler was a socialist like you........

Hitler was a menber of the Withdean branch of Brighton Labour Party? Blimey.
 








E

enigma

Guest
Burns are you EVER going to answer whether you're racist or not? Seeing as you accused me of this, its only fair!

And wheres your famous plan that would have saved all the jews?
 


Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
enigma said:
Burns are you EVER going to answer whether you're racist or not? Seeing as you accused me of this, its only fair!

And wheres your famous plan that would have saved all the jews?
I never accused you of anything. You used a term, "white trash" and then admitted you were racist for using it.:shootself
 


Tooting Gull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
11,033
I have a question for you LI. The recent violent muslim protests over these cartoons have raised the issue of free speech.

This is a personal view - but I believe that governments and police have cowered in the face of violence by the extremists.

They should be unreservedly condemning the protests and banners over what was a mild piss-take by a not-very-good cartoonist - but they are not.

If you give in to this mob over this, you are going down a very slippery slope, which is basically that if a group threatens enough mayhem then papers/broadcaters will not show stuff out of fear. That's basically South Africa of the 60s/70s.

The media have also been cowardly in not reprinting the cartoons. I understand why - their own safety and that of their staff - I just don't agree with it. Christians have the piss taken out of them, the muslims should be no different.

Surely you have to be on the side of free speech? What if it was a left-wing journalist in some South American dictatorship being having his life threatened for his/her views? I don't think your position is consistent.

Why should we in the west forego a long-held tradition of satire just because some thin-skinned nutters can't handle it?
 




WATFORD O

Banned
Jul 6, 2003
3,451
SW6
enigma said:
Burns are you EVER going to answer whether you're racist or not? Seeing as you accused me of this, its only fair!

And wheres your famous plan that would have saved all the jews?


CUN T OFF ENGIMA
 




E

enigma

Guest
WATFORD O said:
CUN T OFF ENGIMA


Deary me Watford. At least Looney can string a sentence together, even if there will be a few spelling mistakes.

Is that the best you can offer ? Surely your multi-million pound empire could do with your inspirational leadership?

Clown :lolol:
 


Smart Mart said:
I think Hitler was slightly more tolerant than youve ever been, Stephen.
Did that sound clever in your head? :)
 




Tom Bombadil

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2003
6,106
Jibrovia
Smart Mart said:
I think Hitler was slightly more tolerant than youve ever been, Stephen.

So you're comparing someone who's prepared to argue his point with someone who conducted a genocidal campaign against jews gypsies, the disabled and homosexuals, ok

???
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here