The Middle Ground
New member
- Nov 15, 2019
- 15
As we all sit here laughing at Leicester we should also feel for others. Most here don't worry about money and paying bills. That £5 you spent on a pint you had post match. There are families who could have fed themselves with that £5. Times are very hard for many many people and now the Government are taking away £20. Are we within our right to slam a girl who wants a family? Living off the state for some may be a right but not everyone chooses that route.
How did she survive before the payment increase?
Kind of agree. The amount she gets is just going back to what it was previously, now the Covid top-up is over.
I get that struggling to survive on benefits is a hard life, and every penny counts, but this is like having a go at a shop that last week had a temporary promotional 5p off a pint of milk, but is now going back to the regular price.
The ‘special’ bit wasn’t ever meant to last. That’s not to be heartless, it’s just the basic point.
Whilst I agree with your agreeing, it's more than education. Our society is run by those whose privilege is beyond our personal fantasies of wealth and success. This economic system is built on keeping most of us down and then a diet of sh*t media and TV (the ruling ideas in any society are the ideas of the ruling class). When I see Towie and Love Island sold as reality TV I wonder if we should face the fact that perhaps civilization is dead and we need to start again in a nicer way. On the bright side 12 points from the first 5 games and I'm back in the zone.I understand the £20 was an uplift, but to be honest this increase still didn't bring the amount awarded to anything like that required to drag people out of poverty, taking this away makes it even more difficult, coming into a time when winter bills will begin to hit.
I know there will be some, even on here, who will say if you can't afford to feed your kids don't have them, but that isn't the crux of the problem really!
None of us know individual circumstances, so judgement shouldn't be passed without that information.
As a previous poster said, it should be about educating people.
As we all sit here laughing at Leicester we should also feel for others. Most here don't worry about money and paying bills. That £5 you spent on a pint you had post match. There are families who could have fed themselves with that £5. Times are very hard for many many people and now the Government are taking away £20. Are we within our right to slam a girl who wants a family? Living off the state for some may be a right but not everyone chooses that route.
Unfortunately there are and have been many out there who have chosen the route of professional parent to a large family, knowing that the state and other organisations will fund their futures. In my book not a sensible decision and probably not fair on the kids longer term. But, as you say, it’s all about choice. Giving a poor family £20 a week for a prolonged period and then expecting them to easily give it up without consequences is pretty naive of the government.
As the previous poster has said, there is an answer (and obviously a much better one!).Saying "shouldn't have the kids" is easy. So what's the solution then, sterilisation for the poor?
The difficulty lies with people who don't learn from it. After all, having five kids (with a sixth on the way) by the time you're 25 isn't exactly unavoidable.As a previous poster said, it should be about educating people.
It's a bit of a double whammy as the price of food has gone up significantly in the last year as well. I would like to think the government is being naive, but honestly think they are inept and don't give a monkeys as it does not affect them.