Now, I’m not for a second commenting on the statue, but isn’t seeing the contradictions within our historic figures really interesting? The dogmatic cultural approach to Churchill in all my learning was pretty much an infallible greatest leader we ever had. But isn’t the truth far more interesting, warts and all?
This is very true, and I didn't start to get into the "warts and all" part of Churchill until doing A-level and then degree in history, long after most people have stopped paying attention. If Churchill had pegged out in 1938 he'd largely have been remembered as a blundering old duffer who royally cocked up over Gallipoli. And indeed as a peace-time politician (and Prime Minister) he was by and large a complete failure (the Gold Standard debacle being the biggest black mark on his CV).
But, in the period from early 1940 to the 1945 election he was undoubtedly the right man in the right place at the right time. And as with so much of our history, the war seems to be one of the few things people care about.