Pretty sure we were saying much the same about CH.
GPott gets sicknotes
CH got djs and psychos.
GPott gets sicknotes
.
i don't think we were, i think we were saying that a 6-3-1 can only end in teears
Best squad we've ever had.
Best season we've ever had (apparently)
And we're still a bit shit.
GPot is rubbish at some things and brilliant at others.
That's absolutely fine, but the way the fanbase has been played by the club propaganda where you're not allowed to complain is a disgrace.
Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
By what metric have you come to the conclusion next season will be any different?
I've pretty much only just stopped facepalming at Adam "5 Minutes" Lallana.
The idea that we can magically rehabilitate injury prone players is cute, but simply doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Once you're liable to being crocked, particularly with muscle injuries, that's the way your body reacts to sport.
Anyone can have an unfortunate crack of heads, get cut in two with a poor challenge or get an impact injury from hitting a post or advert board but if your body struggles with high intensity sport then it will always struggle with high intensity sport.
Lallana is a class player but can anyone really say that he's improved us as a club? Add his and Welbeck's wages together and you get a young striker with a decent finishing ratio, surely?
Hence the question posed in #1.
Is this it?
Irrespective of who comes in are they always going to be a variation of the original Premier League manager, because thems the cards theys dealt.
Wouldn't disagree but to only have 2 teams who have scored less this season than us (Norwich and Burnley - currently in the bottom three), and be where we are is a bit of a miracle in itself.
How we can score so few goals yet be 13th is actually quite an achievement in my book. Surely this summer we have to finally spend big on the Elephant in the room?
We can differ on the former but not the latter.
CH cut his cloth accordingly and eventually paid the price.
As grueling as then was, sat in a near silent stadium watching 1 or 2 shots on target before the fire drill on 75 minutes doesn't feel markedly better.
Every cry of Cardiff is easily retorted with Bumley.
Yes. Waste of a massive transfer fee.
Oh.
Potter OUT! Barber OUT.. . . . . . or is it.... stop dreaming. We are Brighton. We need to remember our place. And our place is being laughed at by Palace.
We have the same amount of points we did at this stage during hughtons last season.No, Potter is completely different to Hughton in that he plays to win, whilst CH all too often played to not lose (in the PL). Our fluid / attacking style of football has given us 33 points and has meant at no point this season have we thought we were going down. Yes we’ve had a poor recent run of results but only against Burnley did we play badly. Even today against world class opposition, we gave a good account of ourselves. We are progressing but in an increasingly competitive league we need to be patient and keep the faith.
does, "CH cut his cloth accordingly",mean he should have played attacking midfielders as auxilliary full backs?
having seen both managers systems, who would would you say has more potential upside, moving forward?
Things never stay the same Stat.
Again I do agree, although GPott isn't adverse to random fullbacks.
Were you to say the difference is that of night and dawn, then I'd wholeheartedly agree.
But if feels like you wouldn't, and if not you others definitely wouldn't, much preferring the correct 'night and day' analogy.
Which is the point at which I strongly disagree, esp after some of the appalling performances, this season alone.
Now how has that come about?
intent is very important i feel, who do you think the players prefer playing for?
The obvious answer is fast becoming neither.
It's hard to imagine they are playing 'for' GPott after Bumley, Villa x 2, Newcastle, The Leeds, Southampton.
I have no idea where the 'Chelsea' side has gone - but those games are rapidly becoming the exception not the rule, much like Utd was for Hughton.