HastingsSeagull
Well-known member
Yes BUT as 3rd choice not as a starter.
This is getting ridiculous.
From discussion with the many friends/acquaintances/etc etc who go to the games regularly they all agree with this assessment. Now the same people come on here and regularly stick up for him and that's fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion. We know that they are a small minority.
So let's agree to disagreetake a look at the poll - it is you who are in a clear minority
But I agree the "discussion" is going nowhere. TBF while I disagree with the character assassination by the thread starter and others I think HastingsSeagull has it right........... if everyone is fit Barnes is realistically third choice if we set up to attack (although not necessarily so if Gus wants to start with a more defensive line-up) and I would agree also that if we sign another striker it will follow that he is likely to be on the bench more than in the starting line-up.