POSKETT AT THE VALLEY
Well-known member
IMHO even nearer a one way ticket.
No idea.what's this world going to look like in 2050?
So, about that idea that "those who don't have the money to cool their environment" will just perish. Do you think that the millions turning to billions of people who will soon be living in uninhabitable conditions will just accept their fate? Or will the natural human survival instinct kick in, meaning an exodus of unimaginable proportion heading to cooler climates? Unfortunately, I'm not sure they will be greeted with a warm welcome.Ah. An opportunity for a bit of future gazing. As hard as I try, I cannot see into the future. So the following is a best guess.
In 2050, either climate change will have got worse, or nuclear war will have solved the problem for us.
Think of what is happening at present. Global warming. We are aware of it, but are unable/unwilling to do enough about it. In the thin slice of time that is right now, we can afford to be complacent, ignore the targets etc. Expediency rules while the future will take care of itself.
The thing is, that might happen. The future might indeed take care of itself.
If you think of the world as a system, then as the world warms, it will take the hindmost. Those most vulnerable. The elderly. The sick. Those who don't have the money to cool their environment. So there will be fewer people to warm the planet. Mankind is already beginning to adapt. Some commentators predict China to lose 600 million people in the next generation, due to the demographic shift.
It's fashionable to predict armageddon, but a permanently warming world is not a likely scenario. We will learn. Adapt. Accommodate. Mitigate. And then change it.
Google Gaia theory - the earth as a self-regulating system.
Note: this is just a hypothesis. But I do think there will be fewer of us.
I’d like to invalidate this due to it being more than one paragraphAh. An opportunity for a bit of future gazing. As hard as I try, I cannot see into the future. So the following is a best guess.
In 2050, either climate change will have got worse, or nuclear war will have solved the problem for us.
Think of what is happening at present. Global warming. We are aware of it, but are unable/unwilling to do enough about it. In the thin slice of time that is right now, we can afford to be complacent, ignore the targets etc. Expediency rules while the future will take care of itself.
The thing is, that might happen. The future might indeed take care of itself.
If you think of the world as a system, then as the world warms, it will take the hindmost. Those most vulnerable. The elderly. The sick. Those who don't have the money to cool their environment. So there will be fewer people to warm the planet. Mankind is already beginning to adapt. Some commentators predict China to lose 600 million people in the next generation, due to the demographic shift.
It's fashionable to predict armageddon, but a permanently warming world is not a likely scenario. We will learn. Adapt. Accommodate. Mitigate. And then change it.
Google Gaia theory - the earth as a self-regulating system.
Note: this is just a hypothesis. But I do think there will be fewer of us.
Is your spot in the bar with the haves or the have-nots?The haves and have nots leading increasingly seperate lives. The have nots will be live in an increasingly violent society but will only be policed properly when this spills over into the ‘have’ part of society. The haves will fool themselves into how wonderful life is without realising how frighteningly dull both they and their existence have become. I will sit chortling at the outcome from either my spot in the bar, or the one in heaven/hell.