Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Immigrants.



E

enigma

Guest
Mr Burns said:
Oh I see, cant be bothered.:glare:

Took you long enough to reply. ???

No chance that to did trawl through the posst and couldn't find anything is there. :nono: :nono: :nono: :nono: :nono:

Or maybe he actually has more important things to do?

The sad thing is, you cant actually accept that you're racist for making the comments. I fully accept that I am racist for making the comment white trash, but I dont mind that. I dont think there is anything wrong with criticising your own kind/race.
 




E

enigma

Guest
Mr Burns said:
Oh look another name. :nono: :dunce: :nono: :dunce: :nono: :nono: Nice to see what your views are though. So its basically to call people scum, when they don't agree with your views. Okay. Fine.:nono:

So you dont think the BNP are scum?
 


Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
enigma said:
So you dont think the BNP are scum?
Some of them are yes. I dont agree with all their views, some are pathetic. But I agree with a lot the say.

Again I wouldn't call all of Labour scum. But when the party invades an innocent country against International law, I would say thats pretty scummie. Buk I wouldnt label the whole of the Labour party scum.
 
Last edited:


Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
enigma said:
Or maybe he actually has more important things to do?

The sad thing is, you cant actually accept that you're racist for making the comments. I fully accept that I am racist for making the comment white trash, but I dont mind that. I dont think there is anything wrong with criticising your own kind/race.
Its amazing how so many people on here can speak for eachother.
 
Last edited:


Mr Burns said:
Oh look another name. :nono: :dunce: :nono: :dunce: :nono: :nono: Nice to see what your views are though. So its basically to call people scum, when they don't agree with your views. Okay. Fine.:nono:

No, plenty of people on here disagree with me, the vast majority at times. :)

You're scum because you support a vile fascist party like the BNP, use the fascist method of blaming all our social problems on immigrants, and have made racist comments towards Asians, referring to them as a plague. A pretty nasty package all in all. I've explained this a number of times already and I'm happy to keep repeating it until it penetrates your BNP-loving skull.
 




E

enigma

Guest
Mr Burns said:
Its amazing how so amny people on he can speak for eachother.

Ooooh childish putdown...

Not really that amazing, it was more amazing that you didnt understandthat he has work and wanted to go to bed.... Do you think that everyone has the time to come on here at late times because you do?

I do because my job starts at 11, but I dont expect others to be on here late. Thats just silly.
 




E

enigma

Guest
Mr Burns said:
Some of them are yes. I dont agree with all their views, some are pathetic. But I agree with a lot the say.

Again I wouldn't call all of Labour scum. But when the party invades an innocent country against International law, I would say thats pretty scummie. Buk I wouldnt label the whole of the Labour party scum.

If you agree with practically anything the BNP say thats not a good thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:




Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
London Irish said:
No, plenty of people on here disagree with me, the vast majority at times. :)

You're scum because you support a vile fascist party like the BNP, use the fascist method of blaming all our social problems on immigrants, and have made racist comments towards Asians, referring to them as a plague. A pretty nasty package all in all. I've explained this a number of times already and I'm happy to keep repeating it until it penetrates your BNP-loving skull.
Again whats with the name calling.

You've managed two sentances and three put downs.

For the millionth time, and I'll keep repeating this until penetrates your skull, I dont support the BNP. As I've said many times, I find a lot of with they say tatally sad. But because I support stopping Asylum, not immagration, asylum you label me a racist. Go on bring up the one comment (as I explained more tonuge in cheek) about the Asians in New Zealand, because you keep repeating it, because all you have.:yawn: :yawn:
 


Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
enigma said:
Ooooh childish putdown...

Not really that amazing, it was more amazing that you didnt understandthat he has work and wanted to go to bed.... Do you think that everyone has the time to come on here at late times because you do?

I do because my job starts at 11, but I dont expect others to be on here late. Thats just silly.
And as you well know, my comments were made because of the delay in answering posts, when before they had plenty of time to write stuff, but when you ask them to back up what they said, and long delay, and all of a sudden their busy and have to go to bed. Yer right . Maybe they'll be decent enough to back up what they say when they have more time then.
 


Mr Burns said:
I dont support the BNP.

On the run now, aren't you :) Keep running, immigrant-hater :wave:
 




Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
London Irish said:
On the run now, aren't you :) Keep running, immigrant-hater :wave:
:lolol: :lolol: On the run from what. You call me yet another name:nono::yawn: :nono: when I've just explained I'm not against immagraiton.:glare: I disagree with Asylum. I'm strongly against it, does not mean I'm an Asylum-hater. I just disagree with it.
 
Last edited:


E

enigma

Guest
Mr Burns said:
And as you well know, my comments were made because of the delay in answering posts, when before they had plenty of time to write stuff, but when you ask them to back up what they said, and long delay, and all of a sudden their busy and have to go to bed. Yer right . Maybe they'll be decent enough to back up what they say when they have more time then.

So perhaps he was checking his e-mails? Or doing something else? He doesnt have to spend his entire internet time on NSC you know. I could have replied instantly there but I am playing FM2006. Big deal.

I think you have a problem admitting what you said and what you are.
 


Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
London Irish said:
No, plenty of people on here disagree with me, the vast majority at times. :)

You're scum because you support a vile fascist party like the BNP, use the fascist method of blaming all our social problems on immigrants, and have made racist comments towards Asians, referring to them as a plague. A pretty nasty package all in all. I've explained this a number of times already and I'm happy to keep repeating it until it penetrates your BNP-loving skull.
I think your views are quite clear, on what you think of people who dont agree with your views. But you still haven't said exactly what your views are. Other than what you think of certain people. Please let people know your views on the subject were trying to debate, otherwise I'd imagine people who can be bothered to read the many posts already posted, will not be able to take you seriously.
 




Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
enigma said:
So perhaps he was checking his e-mails? Or doing something else? He doesnt have to spend his entire internet time on NSC you know. I could have replied instantly there but I am playing FM2006. Big deal.

I think you have a problem admitting what you said and what you are.
FIne, so I presume has he had a lot to say until I asked him to back up his comments, I take it he will reply when he has time. That's fine. I wait with baited breath. And enlighten me, what do I have a problem with admitting?

And i still find it funny:clap: , that you have to have a dig in every post. :glare:
 
Last edited:


Mr Burns said:
:lolol: :lolol: On the run from what.

You're on the run from your slimy, evasive support for the BNP. You've made frequent posts saying how much you support their policies, now backed into a corner, you say you don't support them.

Mr Burns said:
I've just explained I'm not against immagraiton.:glare: I disagree with Asylum. I'm strongly against it, does not mean I'm an Asylum-hater. I just disagree with it.

If you are in favour of economic migration but not asylum, why did you say this to one of your fellow immigrant-hating pondlifers on this thread:

Mr Burns said:
You aint wrong there. It does spoil Auckland having so many Japs and Asians.

You are aware, aren't you, that there is no such thing as a Japanese asylum seeker, only a migrant. Yet you still think they "spoil" Auckland. Why? My bet is it's because you're a racist and you thought you'd get away with shit like that with so many of your fellow immigrant-haters on this thread. Time to face the music for you.
 


E

enigma

Guest
Mr Burns said:
FIne, so I presume has he had a lot to say until I asked him to back up his comments, I take it he will reply when he has time. That's fine. I wait with baited breath. And enlighten me, what do I have a problem with admitting?

And i still find it funny:clap: , that you have to have a dig in every post. :glare:

I think you're a racist but you wont admit to it. I have admitted to it, for saying white trash. But you just seem to deny it, and pass it off what you said as a joke comment, which I think is pathetic.
 


Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
London Irish said:
You're on the run from your slimy, evasive support for the BNP. You've made frequent posts saying how much you support their policies, now backed into a corner, you say you don't support them.



If you are in favour of economic migration but not asylum, why did you say this to one of your fellow immigrant-hating pondlifers on this thread:



You are aware, aren't you, that there is no such thing as a Japanese asylum seeker, only a migrant. Yet you still think they "spoil" Auckland. Why? My bet is it's because you're a racist and you thought you'd get away with shit like that with so many of your fellow immigrant-haters on this thread. Time to face the music for you.
I said that because as an international traveller visiting Auckland, I think seeing so many Japs and Chinesse there does spoil the place. The same as visitng Thailand and Vietnam, the main centers for tourists, seeing so many British and Europeans running a lot of the bars and shops ruined that place for me. Which is why I prefered the smaller towns that where run by the Thai's and Vietenesse.

If I were international visitor and came to England to see England to meet and learn about the English way of life, and landed in one of the main Asian areas of the country, I'd probably be disappointed and move on.

And again, well done with the name calling.

Just a hint, but if you stopped calling certain views scum and pond life, people may take you more seriously. That is are are trying to be taken seriously.
 
Last edited:




Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
enigma said:
I think you're a racist but you wont admit to it. I have admitted to it, for saying white trash. But you just seem to deny it, and pass it off what you said as a joke comment, which I think is pathetic.
But you say I'm a racist because you consider a racist someone who is against Asylum and immragration in its present form. I dont consider that racist. And now you will bring up the New Zealand quote again, to which I have explained in more detail above.

Any congraulations on not slaggin me off in that post. At last a decent comment. I respect your view that you think I'm a racist but for reasons above dont agree with it.
 


Mr Burns said:
I said that because as an international traveller visiting Auckland, I think seeing so many Japs and Chinesse there does spoil the place. The same as visitng Thailand and Vietnam, the main centers for tourists, seeing so many British and Europeans running a lot of the bars and shops ruined that place for me. Which is why I prefered the smaller towns that where run by the Thai's and Vietenesse.

If I were international visitor and came to England to see England to meet and learn about the English way of life, and landed in one of the main Asian areas of the country, I'd probably be disappointed and move on.

And again, well done with the name calling.

Just a hint, but if you stopped calling certain views scum and pond life, people may take you more seriously. That is are are trying to be taken seriously.

You should realise by now I couldn't give a toss whether an evasive racist takes me seriously, I don't waste a second's thought what people like you think. I am just here in this thread to expose your mealy-mouthed lies and hypocrisy.

So we'll try again.

You gave an earlier explanation about why you don't oppose immigration but only oppose asylum seekers. Yet now speaking out of the other side of your mouth, you've just given a lengthy explanation in your previous post about why you oppose immigration in seemingly every part of the world.

So which is it?

The reality is you argue something different whenever it's convenient to you, whenever you are cornered.

Isn't it the truth that you just irrationally hate immigrants? Here you are having a pop at our Asian communities, "disappointing" according to that lovely mealy-mouthed way of yours. You somehow see them as a threat to the English way of life, as if that way of life can, somehow, against all lessons of history, be frozen for all time and never evolve and change due to new cultural influences.

You adopt various rhetorical techniques taught to BNP members (although you may or may not be a member, I'm willing to bet you are a supporter/voter and have learnt from listening to their rhetoric). You carefully focus on the asylum issue, as the BNP tactically does, because that is the issue the British public is most confused about because of our shitty ignorant tabloid press.

You raise issues like housing shortage and OAP's fuel need and then argue that keeping out asylum seekers solves these issues, the classic fascist method of seizing on legitimate working class issues and then finding the black/jew/immigrant scapegoat as the final solution.

Then you use another new fascist trick that is becoming currently popular among BNP members, Orwellian double-think, the anti-racist is the new racist. This BNP technique you used against Enigma when he made some throwaway comment about white trash, your absurd, trivial muddying of the waters of the debate where a description of a chav is somehow equivalent to the decades of terrible racism that our immigrant communities have endured and still endure, from the Notting Hill white mob attacks of the 1950s to the recent murder of Anthony Walker in Liverpool.

Mr Burns, my experience is that if it walks like a BNP-influenced racist, it talks like a BNP-influenced racist, it squawks like a BNP-influenced racist, then, guess what, it is a BNP-influenced racist.

As I told you before, hang around here on NSC as long as you want, peddle your shit and you know I'll always be here to keep you company :wave:
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here