matt
Well-known member
- Mar 19, 2007
- 1,564
World Champion Cardinals 8-0 Nationals
And for those of you who think baseball is "shit boring", you do know you sound like those twats who describe football as "22 grown men kicking a bag of air around" don't you?
Maybe you should try watching the last 15 minutes of the game in Oakland that finished about 6.30 this morning, and then let me know how "boring" that was?
Being a 5 day cricket kind of guy, I'd be happy to sit through a 0-0 if the product had some nuance.Unfortunately, people who are new to baseball or simply don't understand it do not appreciate a game (often 0-0 going into the 9th inning) between 2 pitchers having great games at the same time. I've been to many low scoring games that are every bit as exciting, yes-exciting at baseball, as high scoring games. In Toronto I've been to games that finished way past midnight, subways had stopped running and the only way home was a night bus but it was always worth staying to the end. Like all sport, if you take the time to try and understand it then it can be enjoyable. Take a blinkered view and it will always be 'shit' (not directed at you).
Interestingly (for me), in the world of cricket, it would appear that its equivalent to baseball (20/20) is bringing new fans to the game whereas the 4 day and test formats were losing popularity. Cricket has clearly learned from somewhere that it needed to do something to bring people in, maybe they looked to baseball for inspiration? People simply don't have 4 or 5 days to watch one game these days.
There are all kinds of nuances being missed here though.Being a 5 day cricket kind of guy, I'd be happy to sit through a 0-0 if the product had some nuance.
I'm just not getting it, at the moment.
9 players:-
1 Pitcher
1 catcher
3 base fielders
Leaving 4 fielders, 2 left side 2 right side, job done.
It's hardly bowling against a batsman who likes to hook, having a deep square leg and mid wicket, as well as 3 slips.
'Is he going to drop it in short or pitch it up'.
Granted the pitching can be pretty special.
But as there physically isn't enough time to react to the ball as it's pitched, hitting is a lottery anyway.
I think the test format is pretty strong at the moment, and 20-20 is taking chunks from the 40 over game, which is the one that baseball reminds me of.
In 20/20 there is a sense of urgency and every ball matters, that is what seems to be missing from baseball.
The only time the crowd (albeit beaten) got involved was on the couple of occasions when it was, bases loaded and 2 out.
Went to a Marlins game on the last day of the season, enjoyable but wasnt quite the Cards.
As a fan since the beginning, I have to say that the Marlins aren't quite the Marlins these days either. I wouldn't go back to crowds in the low thousands back at Dolphin/Sun Life/Joe Robbie stadium, but those hideous new uniforms and logo don't do it for me.
I'm surely with you.Personally I enjoy all the American sports. Baseball in particular is good to watch as once you learn all the nuances and what the stats mean it can be fascinating.
Love the American Football too. Like chess with 20 stone geezers as pieces. Superb sport.
The only football I actually watch is Brighton and I have no time for MOTD, the premiership or any other footy.
Am probably in the minority but find the US sports much more engaging than all footy other than Brighton.
Packers, new Nat'nal, it used to be Bucks cos of Green Bay, but that may well end up as Wizards just because of Tony Kornheiser's podcast, which I love listening too, every day.Oh, and it's all about the Bears in the NFL. Orlando Magic for NBA. NJ Devils for the hockey and Yankees for baseball (I lived for some time near New York and went to the old Yankees stadium loads. Superb)
The got to love the way they refer to it as the world series
Just as you are on all politicial threads, you're wrong here too.Its called the World Series because it was originally sponsored by a newspaper called The World. Plenty of things about the US to take the piss out of but the World Series isn't one of them.
There are all kinds of nuances being missed here though.
You get certain batters who can slog it out of the ground and run up to three other batters in.
You get pitchers who are strong but at striking out batters. But some batters will specialise in fouling off the 4th pitch over and over again to tire the pitcher (you can't be struck out on the 4th count by hitting the ball into the foul area, unless you're caught there)
There is the whole base stealing thing going on, so the ball is rarely truly dead
And the double and triple plays, while rare, look pretty spectacular when properly executed, and are often drawn out of the batter by the pitcher.
So you are right; It is said in attitional longer forms of cricket that the fielding team needs to think the batsman man. The same applies in baseball, except it's not done by field placement.
9 players:-
1 Pitcher
1 catcher
3 base fielders
Leaving 4 fielders, 2 left side 2 right side, job done.
I'm not disputing there aren't great plays.
Take The Nat'nals 2 man throw out thingy in game 1, superb.
My issue is where there's enough of that to justify a 4 or 5 hour game.
I was watching last night, through wiziwig.tv.
It's how I stream most of my US sport and cycling.