Exactly. Germany didn't even manage to push our fighters out of the south of England, and even if they had, we'd have been able to attack an invasion fleet from the midlands.I think the expert view is that the Navy would have destroyed any invasion force which would have been sunk in the Channel. Hitler probably knew that. Also I think a good part of the RAF had been withdrawn to the Midlands ready to attack any invasion. So very few Germans would have got to the landing beaches
It counted for plenty considering the numerical and logistical advantages which the allies had in all the theatres you have mentioned, it also wasn't what you said , you specifically stated that aside from the tactics of blitzkrieg that 'there wasn't anything special about the German army' , which ive disagreed with , and I've stated why, you only have to look at how Italian troops fared in north Africa when compared to German troops, or how both romanian and Italian troops performed on the eastern front when compared to the Wehrmacht and SS.and what did that count for at Stalingrad? or El Alamein or after D-Day for that matter. history tells us that the primary military advantage in WWII (and leading up) was in a single tactic, and that they didnt fare so well at other times.
In every scenario ever played at military academies worldwide the Germans would have lost. No air superiority and no navy to speak of plus the English speaking world would ensure this. Pointless debate really.
How about if they had got nuclear capability before the allies?
maybe not so pointless. There was a real danger of right wing politicians doing a deal with Hitler and engineering a coup against Churchill. What would have happened then?