BRIGHT ON Q
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 9,248
Can we also ban people for posting shitty rumors about who we might sign?
I actually consider that HKFC sometimes abuses his position to post confrontational, pompous, condecending, ill-informed, unsubstantiated and even downright laughable opinions on here,... who do I complain to, who is POLICING THE POLICE?No mate. Not this time. Put it this way probably the only MOD with enough balls (apols to Edna) to actually do smething about his trolling.
It certainly is. Smashing stuff.
(I can't believe the odd quality poster like [MENTION=16843]Hillian1[/MENTION] is piling in to defend hb&b. The man is a total bum-hat and had this coming)
It certainly is. Smashing stuff.
(I can't believe the odd quality poster like [MENTION=16843]Hillian1[/MENTION] is piling in to defend hb&b. The man is a total bum-hat and had this coming)
As an NB, if you really thougth he should be banned you should have banned him and put it onto Moderating decisions, not make a big song and dance about it on a thread so you can look good. But I guess then you wouldn't get the attention that you accuse HB&B of seeking. You didn't look good.
*tips hat*Bum-hat is a cracking insult. I'm going to start using that one.
Can we also ban people for posting shitty rumors about who we might sign?
I respect that it must bore you to tears and probably others here. I guess, in my mind, I put HB&B's threads as minor journalist at an official BHAFC press conference, and making it out Poyet was confiding in him, in the same category as Ernest's SAUCE posts or the threads bhadebenhams used to make lusting after Dean Wilkins. The repetitiveness and you-know-what-to-expect nature of the posts are part of their joke, intended or otherwise. I'm surprised people allow themselves to get so worked up about them. I suppose everyone's different.
That is actually the policy. And the reason we've had no hilarious Public School Boy windups... yet.
I actually consider that HKFC sometimes abuses his position to post confrontational, pompous, condecending, ill-informed, unsubstantiated and even downright laughable opinions on here,... who do I complain to, who is POLICING THE POLICE?
I find hb&b a bit moronic but his feeble "look at me" posts don't really grate with me either, yet I'd still have to say I can understand WHY he is banned. Simply put, it is dull and repetitive and irritates plenty of NSC's users.I just don't find Timmy offensive or annoying Simster, what I do find annoying is a mod carrying out personal vendettas because he can.
But hey ho, I can always ignore him, not officially of course, I've tried that and you're not allowed to.
I actually consider that HKFC sometimes abuses his position to post confrontational, pompous, condecending, ill-informed, unsubstantiated and even downright laughable opinions on here,... who do I complain to, who is POLICING THE POLICE?
I'm not going to lose any sleep over HB and B being banned but it doesn't seem right to ban someone just for being irritating. Isn't that what the ignore button's for? And half the fun of NSC is the random nonsense that we all post on here, including starting new threads about poo/DIY/holidays etc etc. I'll read any old shite, doesn't need to be interesting or informative - sometimes its very randomness can be the attraction.
(For what it's worth, I've always found HB and B's irrepressible bumptiousness quite amusing.)
Sting?
Can we also ban people for posting shitty rumors about who we might sign?
I find hb&b a bit moronic but his feeble "look at me" posts don't really grate with me either, yet I'd still have to say I can understand WHY he is banned. Simply put, it is dull and repetitive and irritates plenty of NSC's users.
Equally, I don't care sufficiently but there are plenty of other repetitive bores on here who really ought to have no complaints if they are booted out for a few days. And lets be clear about this, we are ONLY talking seven days. I can't believe so many have got their kickers in a twist over this issue. He'll be back next week FFS.
Sting?