50p and a lb of grapes.You’d have done it for half that?
50p and a lb of grapes.You’d have done it for half that?
Bravo, that takes me all the way back to the eighties.50p and a lb of grapes.
It’s not often recognised these days! Well done Sir!Bravo, that takes me all the way back to the eighties.
Easily one of the best sentences in NSC historyI hope you don’t suffer too much from the absolute gangbanging you’re going to get when you’re told to get the coffees in at work.
Thank you. Not one I ever expected to write, to be honest.Easily one of the best sentences in NSC history
I may have used the internet to research some tractors and then accidentally accessed the wrong website……“Rich Man Watches Porn”
The world was shocked today to learn that a man in his early 60s had watched pornography via the internet.
Our survey on the street today showed that precisely 0% of those surveyed had ever watched pornography via the internet, and were horrified that somebody might misuse the benign, notoriously kind technology for such a terrible purpose.
“I’ve only ever used the internet to donate to charities.” claimed Fergus, 19.
Another of those surveyed, who chose not to give their name, admitted “I do like looking at ****s, I’ve set my homepage to Conservative Home.”
“Ta, Moley”50p and a lb of grapes.
I may have used the internet to research some tractors and then accidentally accessed the wrong website……
Not Dan Wootton.One of the most surreal moments last night was watching another "news" presenter live on air as a massive story broke with direct allegations.
The Guardian have finally reported it now.
Sun and Mail publishers examine claims against journalist Dan Wootton
GB News presenter facing allegations he inappropriately offered colleagues large sums in return for sexual materialwww.theguardian.com
As a rule I am uncomfortable with somebody's reputation getting trashed via unproven (so far) allegations and the actions of a twitter mob.Not Dan Wootton.
Say it ain’t so.
Responds. I pass no judgement.
He also looks like a wrong 'un. That's not normally good enough for me. But given the other data....Ooh let me then! What a load of sanctimonious, duplicitous, unironic bollocks spoken by someone who, from the little I've seen, is a vile individual who has no hesitation in attacking anyone else with little or no evidence, has the morals of Donald Trump and seeks to defend the likes of Rees-Mogg and Laurence Fox and the gutter scraping Sun. He can frankly stew in this cesspit of his own making whether the allegations are true or not.
Not sure that's ever happened on here...A polarised debate which has probably run its course now. We should let poor Huw rebuild his life/career/reputation in the comfort and sanctity of the Priory and move onto more important issues.
I really really don’t care about what he does. But watching him squirm is delicious viewing. A terrible man.As a rule I am uncomfortable with somebody's reputation getting trashed via unproven (so far) allegations and the actions of a twitter mob.
There are however, exceptions to every rule. In this case, the exception being based on it happening to someone that has led countless twitter mobs himself, ruining (and in one case ending) peoples lives and all for the worst possible of reasons - money and ego.
Rarely has so much Schaden been Freuded.
That's the thing that people who side with the likes of GB News/Wooton(or Branning) – they think that it's double standards to call out him, but not, say, Edwards or Schofield. When, in reality, it's merely a case of highlighting the hypocrisy on show.I really really don’t care about what he does. But watching him squirm is delicious viewing. A terrible man.
Responds. I pass no judgement.