Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Hurricane Sandy



HovaGirl

I'll try a breakfast pie
Jul 16, 2009
3,139
West Hove
Perhaps climate change may get a bit of coverage in the US election now

Why should it? Climate change has always been a naturally-occurring phenomena on our planet. Why should one species have the power to make a significant impact on something so much more powerful than ourselves?
 




Notters

Well-known member
Oct 20, 2003
24,895
Guiseley
Why should it? Climate change has always been a naturally-occurring phenomena on our planet. Why should one species have the power to make a significant impact on something so much more powerful than ourselves?

Jeez. What do you mean why should we? We do. End of. Only a handful of nutterms deny it.
 


BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Jeez. What do you mean why should we? We do. End of. Only a handful of nutterms deny it.

Dont be bloody stupid.

Climate change does not exist in the context of human cause.

Yeah, governments have hung their hats on it to tax us to the hilt, but you keep filling your recycling bin with a few empty bake bean tins and feel ever so smug at your efforts to save us all from global meltdown.

I assume you didnt grow up in the 70's where the self same government scientists told us all of the impending ice age.

Climate does change, it what it does.
 


Notters

Well-known member
Oct 20, 2003
24,895
Guiseley
Dont be bloody stupid.

Climate change does not exist in the context of human cause.

Yeah, governments have hung their hats on it to tax us to the hilt, but you keep filling your recycling bin with a few empty bake bean tins and feel ever so smug at your efforts to save us all from global meltdown.

I assume you didnt grow up in the 70's where the self same government scientists told us all of the impending ice age.

Climate does change, it what it does.
Assuming you've also spent 10 years studying and working in environmental science then I apologise.
 






Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,455
Sussex
Over reaction and mass hysteria by the Yanks . . . no shock there then

Imagine if they had a cat 3 or higher hurricane there would of been mass suicides
 


matthew

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2009
2,413
Ovingdean, United Kingdom
Dont be bloody stupid.

Climate change does not exist in the context of human cause.

Yeah, governments have hung their hats on it to tax us to the hilt, but you keep filling your recycling bin with a few empty bake bean tins and feel ever so smug at your efforts to save us all from global meltdown.

I assume you didnt grow up in the 70's where the self same government scientists told us all of the impending ice age.

Climate does change, it what it does.

So you would discount the findings of all the best scientists in the world because the government wants to screw us?
 


Woodchip

It's all about the bikes
Aug 28, 2004
14,460
Shaky Town, NZ
Over reaction and mass hysteria by the Yanks . . . no shock there then

Imagine if they had a cat 3 or higher hurricane there would of been mass suicides
And we're so good at handling hurricanes as a nation aren't we. When was the last one again?!?

New Orleans didn't have mass suicides and that was a Cat 5 with Katrina. Yanks are pretty damn good at handling hurricanes.
 




Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,465
Hove
Dont be bloody stupid.

Climate change does not exist in the context of human cause.

Yeah, governments have hung their hats on it to tax us to the hilt, but you keep filling your recycling bin with a few empty bake bean tins and feel ever so smug at your efforts to save us all from global meltdown.

I assume you didnt grow up in the 70's where the self same government scientists told us all of the impending ice age.

Climate does change, it what it does.

You realise that there are finite resources on the planet right (indisputable fact)!? Even if you don't believe in climate change, do you believe honestly that we should be mining for metals and materials rather than recycling material that we have? Are you also saying you'd rather pay more in energy bills than build homes that need minimal energy to heat them over the course of their lifetime? Or perhaps it's better to clear great swathes of beautiful landscapes in the search for more oil reserves or building new power stations!?

That's what I don't get about climate skeptics, even if climate change isn't man made (and I agree with the overwhelming number of environmental scientists that it is), a sustainable culture is just a logical step to take so that we're not searching the countryside for landfill sites, that we're not mining for materials that we can easily obtain through sensible reuse and recycling, and that we're reducing our energy consumption so that we can minimise the no. of nuclear power plants we need to build and vis-à-vis our own energy bills.

If someone is being stupid, it's got to be the person who hasn't really thought out their argument at all....
 


Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,465
Hove
Over reaction and mass hysteria by the Yanks . . . no shock there then

Imagine if they had a cat 3 or higher hurricane there would of been mass suicides

Yes, because approx. only 2000 people died from Katrina and an entire city destroyed when they didn't properly react....

Perhaps a little perspective of why they are so heightened to the threat is needed (for those with short term memories).
 


BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Assuming you've also spent 10 years studying and working in environmental science then I apologise.

Your bound to be pissed off.

You have invested part of your soul in this 21st century scam.

Your like the elderly relative that is waiting for the Readers Digest cheque or bank transfer from your friend in Nigeria, it has to be true, it just has to.
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Prove it.

Prove what ???

In my lifetime the weather has mirrored pretty much what the weather has been for a few hundred years, today is no different, yesterday was no different and I am guessing tomorrow too, will serve up nothing exceptional.

So you bloody well prove it to me !!!
 


Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,455
Sussex
Yes, because approx. only 2000 people died from Katrina and an entire city destroyed when they didn't properly react....

Perhaps a little perspective of why they are so heightened to the threat is needed (for those with short term memories).

point taken , I'm being flippant of course but did seem a massive over reaction to what is a cat 1 storm.
 


Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick
If the storm doesn't get you, the sharks in NJ might

223746_521914077838710_906158910_n.jpg
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
So you would discount the findings of all the best scientists in the world because the government wants to screw us?

Er well of course, 'best' I think you mean most subsidised scientists and government screwing us, surely not.
 




simmo

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2008
2,787
That's what I don't get about climate skeptics, even if climate change isn't man made (and I agree with the overwhelming number of environmental scientists that it is),

If someone is being stupid, it's got to be the person who hasn't really thought out their argument at all....

Why do you think that?

To me all other climate changes have occured naturally. As an example in and out of ice ages (when the differentials in temperatures were so much more extreme than now) which humans survived and eventually thrived?

Why (and how) are you certain that this climate change is caused by man?
 








Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,465
Hove
Why do you think that?

To me all other climate changes have occured naturally. As an example in and out of ice ages (when the differentials in temperatures were so much more extreme than now) which humans survived and eventually thrived?

Why (and how) are you certain that this climate change is caused by man?

Because we can analysis the earths weather cycles over millions of years through looking at things like ice core data which can tell us a lot about weather over a huge span of time. What is evident is that we are being 'kicked' out of a a natural cycle of climate through accelerated climatic change caused mainly through unprecedented levels of CO2 in the air. The isotopic signature of the extra levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are from fossil fuels. This is scientific fact as can be measured. What is also clear is that CO2 levels almost always lag behind climate change over thousands/millions of years, what is happening now is that CO2 levels are leading the change in the climate. We have departed the earths natural climatic cycle, and something like 97% of scientists agree on this.

Those skeptical about this established science are not 'skeptics', they are 'denialists' - because they are simply refusing to believe the evidence before them. Skeptic insinuates someone who is willing to question and is open to be convinced. A denialist is someone who simply will not accept the evidence.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here