A draw would be a very decent result.
Wrong ...A win would be a decent result....A draw would be so so ...and a loss would be a bad result.
A draw would be a very decent result.
I've only seen us lose once there.
In Baldock's absence would expect us to set up 4-5-1 with Hemed up top. Murphy and March on the wings with Lua Lua poised for a 20 minute cameo. Kayal, Stephens and Crofts in the middle with Dale slightly more advanced. Keeper and defence picks itself.
No place for GG then ?
In Baldock's absence would expect us to set up 4-5-1 with Hemed up top. Murphy and March on the wings with Lua Lua poised for a 20 minute cameo. Kayal, Stephens and Crofts in the middle with Dale slightly more advanced. Keeper and defence picks itself.
I think we have missed Greer's organisational skills so would be tempted, if fit, to pick him instead of Dunk.Dunk and Uwe with GG on the bench for me.
Not for me. 1 - 1Can see us sneaking it
I know what Hughton is trying to say but we are in November now so we know what Brighton's level is.
It's up to Hughton and his players to maintain that level and not for other teams to show him Brighton's level.
Surprised then that one of his four isn't Hull City.
The 2 big money spenders plus QPR and Burnley would probably have been who he initially thought would be up there. Hull lost a few key players close season
The 2 big money spenders plus QPR and Burnley would probably have been who he initially thought would be up there. Hull lost a few key players close season
I think that they only lost a couple of defenders.
Certainly not like losing your captain, your top assisst-er and your top goalscorer like us.
Big spenders; http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/championship/transfers/wettbewerb/GB2/saison_id/2015
Derby £19.8 m
Burnley £15.5 m (sales + parachute)
Boro £13.9 m
Wednesday £8.1 m
QPR £8 m (parachute)
Hull £6.4 m (sales + parachute)
Fulham £5.9 m (sales + parachute)
Brighton £5.8 m (sales the season before)
Hull did not lose as many players as expected.