Not Andy Naylor
Well-known member
I think you need to find out what was really happening behind the scenes at the club back then. Money always talks
Yeah, what do I know?
But technically, TB's first sacking was Russell Slade.
I think you need to find out what was really happening behind the scenes at the club back then. Money always talks
But for all we know Burke may have done fantastically well considering the restraints he is under.
All SH said when he was appointed was that he liked the way we played and just wanted to improve the quickness in transition between defence and attack. That seems to have morphed somewhat!
Yeah, what do I know?
But technically, TB's first sacking was Russell Slade.
Restraints ? According to Bloom this is the most expensive squad in history. His record on cost for performance is appalling.
That's interesting if he has. I doubt that this is standard practice in the football world though.
My assumption is on the basis of TB being a learner. Looking at his business career (and to a lesser extent his poker one), he very much appears as a man who, having made a mistake, prepares himself for situation next time. His consultancy business is built almost entirely on this premise... get a result wrong, then you re-configure the model for the new data and don't make that mistake again.
I personally think he will see Poyet's departure as a personal failure. It was messy, ill-tempered and too public and that will have irked a man like Tony. I think, learning from the past, he will have set a number of "exit" clauses into firstly OG's and now SH's contracts, then can be invoked BEFORE it all gets too unpleasant.
I have absolutely NO evidence for this assumption BTW. This is just on the basis of spending time studying the man and, actually, having a similar background and personality (but with none of the success I hasten to add!)
Yup, that all makes sense. It is an interesting theory - dunno if we will ever find out if you are right though! It also adds another dimension to this theory on here, from some, that various managers turned us down before Sami - if true perhaps it was not the DoF setup that put them off but rather performance clauses in the contract?
You have to say if you were the guy being given these conditions in you contract, that you would request to have a clause stating, that this is acceptable on the basis that star players are not sold and hence weakening your squad and ability to perform
But that would leave unhappy players at the club which could also undermine your performance clauses.
The most successful transfer policies mean always selling your best players when someone offers more than you perceive them to be worth. You are, however, supposed to have their replacements already in the squad. According to "Soccernomics" anyway - read it if you have not done so already - it is very interesting.
I fully understand all that and agree with you, but how can you possibly sack a manager for bad results when you have sold all his assets, would this not someway be considered constructive dismissal?
Well, perhaps there's a bit of, 'He would say that, wouldn't he' about that; surely when interviewed he wouldn't have said he was going to chuck everything out of the window and start again from scratch (although that's almost what happened to the playing personnel).All SH said when he was appointed was that he liked the way we played and just wanted to improve the quickness in transition between defence and attack. It was in his interviews he did when he got the job. I first heard it on the seagull player interview, but he repeats it at the end of this article:
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/27812911
Mmm although we know we have sold the best players, you could never 'prove' that in a CD case...! Besides, the club would now point to Hyppia working with the most expensive squad in our history??
This. DK, in his interview on Latest TV on Saturday morning, pinpointed exactly what the current squad's weaknesses are, and where improvement needed to be made.
He has other business interests and spends a significant amount of the year in Australia.
No he dosen't, your the 2nd person I've seen post this about TB, how much time do you think is significant ?
He has other business interests and spends a significant amount of the year in Australia.
No he dosen't, your the 2nd person I've seen post this about TB, how much time do you think is significant ?
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2010/dec/15/poker-victoria-coren
Victoria Coren is a very close friend of his
She's in such a bad mood!As far as missing the point goes you are either spectacularly inept or a very good WUM.
Cheers Tom, what was the name of the show so I can look out for a repeat?
Failing that, can you outline what he said in brief?
No he wasn't, he had a wealth of experience and did a fantastic job. He was exactly the right person for Bloom to discuss things with, rather than relying on the advice from Poyet, Burke and Bloom.