Would be happy if leon was released?
If the rumour was to become true (which i doubt it for obvious reasons) who would be happy about it?
If the rumour was to become true (which i doubt it for obvious reasons) who would be happy about it?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
How many People
- Thread starter Kinky Gerbil
- Start date
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
Anyone who would be happy is an idiot.
surrey jim
Not in Surrey
depends who the money goes on,
Leon got us promotion to the CC but recent tempet tantrums mean he's not 100% commited to MM
Leon got us promotion to the CC but recent tempet tantrums mean he's not 100% commited to MM
Rougvie
Rising Damp
Actually I heard from a source close to the club that he HASNT been released.
Hypothetically I would be disapointed, the guy is useful and has made a decent contribution over the last few seasons.
Hypothetically I would be disapointed, the guy is useful and has made a decent contribution over the last few seasons.
mcshane in the 79th
New member
- Nov 4, 2005
- 10,485
I'd never be happy with it as I still think he can be a vital player for us this season.
The Keeper
New member
KinkyGoehring said:
It is time for him to leave, but who would we replace him with?
I heard McGhee was going on a scouting mission to Venezuela to check out a promising young striketr, apparently he has scored 50 goals this season in their 4th div.
Must be worth a punt
- Thread starter
- #7
surrey jim said:
There would be no money, the club would be poorer from releasing him.
mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
KinkyGoehring said:
saving wages on a player who dosent play though.
Northstander
Well-known member
- Oct 13, 2003
- 14,031
two thoughts...
one I'd be happy only if ......
two as long as we replaced him with an out and out goal scorer!
one I'd be happy only if ......
two as long as we replaced him with an out and out goal scorer!
- Thread starter
- #10
mejonaNO12 aka riskit said:
You have to pay up his contract.
Schrödinger's Toad
Nie dla Idiotów
- Jan 21, 2004
- 11,957
mejonaNO12 aka riskit said:
Surely in releasing him, you'd have to pay him the remainder of his wages?
mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
ah that is true actually.
sorry.
sorry.
Superseagull
Well-known member
- Jul 8, 2003
- 2,123
IF we do release him another club would probably take over the remainder of his contract, therefore our "transfer fee" would be the money we save on his wages.
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
We don't have to release him, his contract expires at end of season... suggest we DON'T offer him a new one... technically, he is one of our best players, but... in terms of contribution, he is NOT... time to say bye bye... but we MUST get a replacement in, or the above argument is invalidated...
BTW... I can't imagine there will be many, if any, CCC clubs beating a path to our door for his services... not exactly prolific in this league, is he?... and he has obvious attitude problems...
BTW... I can't imagine there will be many, if any, CCC clubs beating a path to our door for his services... not exactly prolific in this league, is he?... and he has obvious attitude problems...
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
Well, unless you count the fact that he is our leading scorer and asisster. Other than that his contribution is poor though.B.W. said:
Last edited:
dunno
Old Skool
I don't want to see him just released - he's far too much of an asset for that - but if we could exchange him for someone that would be a different matter. Leeds have got thousands of strikers can we swap him for someone there
The Keeper
New member
B.W. said:
Hull city
bhaexpress
New member
I wouldn't be happy but I would understand if there is to be a parting of the ways.
Knight has proved he's not a championship striker however I'd still be pleased if we kept him as there is no doubt he has bags of skill. If we could get some money or a swap for a player who could get more than 4 goals a season I wouldn't be overly dissapointed