Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

How can you call Dick Knight, Dick Tight?



bhadeb

New member
Jan 11, 2008
1,257
What I get FUCKIN sick of on here is when people turn nasty towards me including moderators - Everyone is allowed their opinions on here apart from me but many just see it as an opportunity to be vile and nasty towards me - none of you know who I am so I find it hard to see how you can judge me as a person or what I know - I have always said from the start that what i say is true - I have nothing against Dick Knight - yes he saved the club but what I know that he has done over the past few years fans would not be happy with - I have always said that what I know is in confidence and that is why I can't say all the details - For what its worth i think Dean and Ian are better off out of all of it now - At least they can't be stabbed in the back anymore
 








cjd

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2006
6,306
La Rochelle
So basically what you seem to be saying is that when they do good things it is the board (and the Blooms in particular) and bad things are Dick Knight's fault. That seems fair.

No........if you,ve ever read my posts, I have often stated that the Board as such, is really, only Dick Knight.

Two of the five Directors have virtually no financial input, Mr. chapman is more concerned with his own construction business.........and has been said many times, the Blooms do not wish to "run" the club.

I mention the Blooms..more as an acknowledgement, that without them, not only would we have potless Chairman.....but a potless board too.

May I also point out, that I have often noted DKs good points.....but see no reason whatsoever, to brush his bad points under the carpet, and pretend that all he does is perfect, and beyond question.
 






The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
No........if you,ve ever read my posts, I have often stated that the Board as such, is really, only Dick Knight.

Two of the five Directors have virtually no financial input, Mr. chapman is more concerned with his own construction business.........and has been said many times, the Blooms do not wish to "run" the club.

I mention the Blooms..more as an acknowledgement, that without them, not only would we have potless Chairman.....but a potless board too.

May I also point out, that I have often noted DKs good points.....but see no reason whatsoever, to brush his bad points under the carpet, and pretend that all he does is perfect, and beyond question.

Mr Chapman does not run a construction business. He is part of the Falmer Project team.
 








El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,000
Pattknull med Haksprut
Everyone is allowed their opinions on here apart from me

What evidence do you have that you are not allowed your opinion?

As far as I can see you are allowed to state your views, it is just that many people don't agree with your whispering campaign about DK. I don't think there is a soul on here that thinks he is faultless, but on balance his good points far outweigh the bad, and that is why he has broad support.

If you have evidence to the contrary then state it, you do not have to breach confidence in doing so, and people will make their own judgements.
 




cjd

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2006
6,306
La Rochelle
A company he used to work for.

Admittely as the big boss.

How do you think he would have time to run Adenstar AND work on the Falmer project?

I,m sure he,ll be delighted to know, that you think he has nothing to do with Adenstar..............:lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol:
 






bhadeb

New member
Jan 11, 2008
1,257
What evidence do you have that you are not allowed your opinion?

As far as I can see you are allowed to state your views, it is just that many people don't agree with your whispering campaign about DK. I don't think there is a soul on here that thinks he is faultless, but on balance his good points far outweigh the bad, and that is why he has broad support.

If you have evidence to the contrary then state it, you do not have to breach confidence in doing so, and people will make their own judgements.

The unecessary personal comments - yourself included when you told me to go f*** myself - charming - Am i meant to put up with comments like that - other people on here share similar opinions to me but don't get all this
 






The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
The unecessary personal comments - yourself included when you told me to go f*** myself - charming - Am i meant to put up with comments like that - other people on here share similar opinions to me but don't get all this

You don't have opinions, so I don't see how you can make that claim. You post half-statements with no meaning and no justification.

'Dick lied...' etc. Fine - so he lied, so what? Where is the problem in that?

Despite repeated requests for some clarification of your statements, something all of us would be interested in, (you could be holding back information that we all might NEED to know) to actually give your statements some meaning, you still believe yourself to be above everyone else on here by treating us as not worthy of this information.

Is your source so protected that it's something NO-ONE else knows, and that this information could bring down the whole board?
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,000
Pattknull med Haksprut
The unecessary personal comments - yourself included when you told me to go f*** myself - charming - Am i meant to put up with comments like that - other people on here share similar opinions to me but don't get all this

1. I'm old school, I'm approaching 50 and had never sworn at a woman in my life until your barbed comments.

2. As anyone who has met BoF will testify, he is one of life's nice guys, yet you provoked in him exactly the same reaction as in me. Perhaps you ought to reflect on why people are reacting to you in such a way?

3. If you swear on this board, you can hardly complain when people give it back.


For what it's worth, I was disappointed (but not surprised) that Dean Wilkins was removed as manager. You have heard one version of the story and have it in for Dick Knight as a result, but are not prepared to give those details, instead just repeatedly claiming that DK is a liar, but not saying what those lies are. You don't seem to know the difference between the role of a chairman and a director, or how boards operate, yet confidently claim that all good things are down to the Blooms and bad ones are down to Dick Knight.

Similarly with Ian Chapman I'm sorry to see him go, I used to play football down the park with him in Woodingdean when he was a kid. I'd love it if he had some connection with the Albion still.
 






Superphil

Dismember
Jul 7, 2003
25,679
In a pile of football shirts
Crap post, deleted
 


Mendoza

NSC's Most Stalked
Todays Argus said Tony Bloom funding our transfer window.

Knight is the one is in all the photos with the new players. Bloom just watches from aside.

Does it matter where the money comes from, we signed the players and we will see them in a Brighton shirt, so I'm happy with that

Oh and Alan, there is a double page spread about Mr Chapman and his role, and life at Adenstar in the business section :)
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here