I thought you were talking about CHRISTMAS TREES as I have a massive one.
The telly is a "normal" 42 inches.
Mrs B - "so we're settled then, a 49" TV"
Bozza - "Hang on a minute"
Mrs B - "Oh no not 'them' again, can't we make one decision without them?"
B - "But but, they normally come good"
Mrs B - "They're a bunch of social misfits who you're keeping off the streets"
B - "They think the TV will magically shrink and we'll end up disappointed"
Mrs B - "see?"
B - "I think we should get the 55" TV"
Mrs B - "49" "
B - "Yes dear".
We've just constructed the 55" size out of cardboard. It just feels too big. Going to go 49".
Merry Xmas Bozza
This thread has got me all dewey eyed to this very day in 1976, when Chez Hart took delivery of our first ever colour TV, 20 inch Ferguson.
Size didn't matter back then.......
I need to buy a new TV so my lad can have a TV (our current TV) in his room for gaming.
I just can't decide how much bigger to go than the 40" we currently have, which I appreciate is quite small by modern standards.
I know that anything bigger will, initially at least, feel humongous in comparison and I'm also aware of the "chav factor" that can come with having a massive TV.
So, I think I'm torn between 49/50" and 55". In most cases the jump in sizes of the same model is negligible additional cost which is why I'm being drawn to the 55", but I do wonder if it will be just TOO BIG.
40" has an area of 684 square inches
50" has an area of 1068 square inches (56% bigger)
55" has an area of 1293 square inches (89% bigger)
How big is yours and would you go BIGGER if you had the chance?
I think the only room we don’t have a tv in is in the shithouse.
Luckily I have my IPad for these two 15 minute periods a day.
I've never understood why people wall mount them high up, especially above a mantelpiece. Get bloody neck ache!
More prunes
To be honest I’d happily sit there longer but my legs go numb.