This is NSC, someone on here is always f***ing complaining!Also, the simple fact is had the comment not been made nobody could have complained about anything.
This is NSC, someone on here is always f***ing complaining!Also, the simple fact is had the comment not been made nobody could have complained about anything.
totally fine. just it seems to me your threads on it are designed to provoke a reaction hence the whole thing snowballing, I actually think you'd be quite good hosting the show
Also, the simple fact is had the comment not been made nobody could have complained about anything.
I doubt if anyone complained as a result of hearing the programme alone.
This is NSC, someone on here is always f***ing complaining!
Not quite sure how Richie telling the truth deserves this sort of response.:thud:
This is NSC, someone on here is always f***ing complaining!
Course I am, that's why I said someone is ALWAYS complaining, can't you read?...And of course you're never one of them...:irony:
Not quite sure how Richie telling the truth deserves this sort of response.
I doubt very much that the views of Mencap and Scope in relation to this Teacup tornado can be taken seriously.
"Hello Mencap..how can I help?"
"Good morning, I'm calling from the Argus, I wonder if you would like to comment on the remarks made by two BBC presenters during the Brighton phone in last night?"
"What comments?"
"Well during the show the presenters started referring to their listeners as "window lickers", I just wondered if that term would be considered offensive by Mencap?"
"Why yes it is! thank you for bringing this outrage to our attention because otherwise we would have been completely unaware of it, of course we will give you a quote on how remarks such as this are deeply offensive and the need for any sort of context is obviously not necessary"
Nowhere is it suggested that Mencap complained. Mencap commented on the story when the Argus approached them.
fair enough, must admit I only read the story once. I did wonder why a spokesman from Mencap would be listening to Brighton vs Orient in the Johnstone Paint 2nd round
Some interesting points here so I think I'll throw my hat into the ring.
First and foremost, I don't accept the suggestion there will be no commentary tomorrow. Surely they would draft someone in from another region or get in whoever does the Surrey opt-out coverage. Failing that it could be the big promotion for one of the bods who cover the Eastbourne, Crawley and Lewes games. I'd imagine 3-5pm on a Saturday is one of their biggest pulls. They're not going to let that drop.
Now, as for the suspensions. Sorry to go against the grain but I think the BBC has got it right. First and foremost, I think Harty is a legend. I don't need to repeat all the things he has done for the club and , of course, he produced what I (maybe biasedly) regard as the finest fanzine in football history. And in that fanzine, it was his right to speak to and about people however he wanted.
Working for the BBC is a different kettle of fish. He is working for a public service broadcaster and to that extent has to remain professional. If we're going to let it go, should we let Huw Edwards refer to Zimbabwean farmers attacking farms as "Niggers on the rampage"? Should we start referring to "paki shiops"? Why didn't Harty just go the whole hog and refer to people as "spastics" rather than just window lickers. I'm sorry but that's the way it is. Yes, it probably was a slip of the tongue made in anger and frustration but it still shouldn't have happened.And I have no idea what Hawesy was doing repeating it. Maybe he was a bit fazed but he should definitely have known that it was not acceptable. Say it in the pub, email it to your mates but don't say it live on the radio. It's pretty simple really.
However, the punishment should fit the crime and hopefully the BBC will see sense and a severe reprimand will be dished out and they'll be back on the air soon. Assuming it was an unfortunate, embarrassing slip of the tongue. It shouldn't have happened but it certainly wasn't part of a vitriolic diatribe. Hopefully both will be able to consider that and just be a little bit more careful next time. What people think and how they choose to label disabled people, ethnic minorities and the like is up to them but I don't think the BBC is really the place it should be coming out. Accidental or not.
jesus christ this is a prime example of PC gone mad. How one comment that was made in the heat of the moment, and that was even apologised for minutes later has gone so far is crazy. Harty obviously does a lot for various charities that are related to the albion and to lose his job would be an absoulute disgrace.
Why do people feel the need to make official complaints? Have they got nothing better to do than report someone for a slip of the tongue. Pathetic. Yes, it was a comment that looking back was wrong, and there was an apology, couldn't people leave it there? This is the same BBC that put little britain on prime time TV which takes the piss out of various groups of people and is there to be laughed at.
People went mental about it. .
That is undoubtedly how it went. BUT just because they were not aware of it being said does not mean they cannot be offended when they do hear about it does it?
I remember doing a story about a pie shop in Hastings which had the sign 'No windowlickers' on the window. People went mental about it. I think it is a touchy phrase and one anyone going on the radio should know they should not be using.
I'm not saying that the BBC read NSC and decided to sack a radio presenter. I'm saying that someone read NSC and got sufficiently fired up about things to complain direct to the BBC - who then acted.I love the arrogance of this board- some losers actually think NSC is SOOOOOOOOOOO powerful it can get BBC radio presenters sacked?
jesus, get your heads out of your arses
excellent turn of phrase there