Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
I was looking for a photo and this random image popped up. I thought I might share it.
Harrowing.
Harrowing.
I was looking for a photo and this random image popped up. I thought I might share it.
Harrowing.
I almost agree with these sentiments, and indeed I want to, but I can't. Hillsborough happened, not because of the design of the stadium, but because of the huge number of Liverpool fans that turned up without a ticket trying to blag their way in. Yes the police made mistakes, and once these fans were inside it was carnage, BUT if they hadn't been there in the first place it would never have happened.
Of course people dying is tragic, especially as the likelihood is that the people who dies were people with tickets who got into the ground early (as they were nearest the fences) but until the Liverpool fans actually admit that they contributed enormously to these events, rather than revel in their tragic self pitying way in sad nostalgia, then I don't have the degree of sadness that many here seem to be displaying.
did they do one about Heysel (imagine if Millwall had rioted in the European cup final) or ask why there were more liverpool fans in sheffield than tickets sold? Respects to the families, but "justice for the 96" should include suing the liverpool fans that turned up without tickets and were pushing on the gate at the leppings lane end. The scouse "its always someone elses fault" does not stand up to close scrutiny. Not a trendy view but then, often a balanced view isn't.
BUT if they hadn't been there in the first place it would never have happened.
I was looking for a photo and this random image popped up. I thought I might share it.
Harrowing.
It's amazing how often that myth gets peddled out.
I'd advise you to read the offical report at the time to see how much effect fans turning up without tickets had on the tragedy.
Did you know the health and safety executive painstakingly sat through all the CCTV and counted every single fan entering the stadium and compared it to the tickets that were sold ?
Added to that, tickets were still available on the day.
Quite simply what you've suggested happened quite simply didn't. Just because newspapers and television media reported it at the time because of the misleading comments of an discredited official (and subsequently apologised) doesn't make it true.
So let us just again repeat the line from the Taylor report that you seem to be unable to understand:
Taylor surmised there was no substance to the allegation that ticketless fans caused the Disaster.
Quite what gives you the authority to have a different take on it is beyond comprehension. Did you commision your own report ?
Sure chuck insults if someoe does not agree with ou, when you get a bit older you grow out of that. And Heysel was not their fault as well of course. For all the blaming of the bloke on the gate, the police, the ambulance men, the safety officer the fact is people turned up without a ticket. As they always did for scouse games in the 80's. I have not heard a call to sue the people that turned up without a ticket. Its the scouse desire to blame and sue someone that gets my goat. "Justice for the 96" means, blame everyone and everyone but scousers.. as they tried to do for Heysel. Did you know they tried to sue for watching the disaster on tv before the courts put a stop to that? Disgraceful. It was an accident, and a disaster. Very sad for the families of the dead, the police and emergency services that had to work the game, as was Bradford, but the scousers go on and on and on about it without one ounce of looking at the fault of their own fans or the impact it had on others.
Sure chuck insults if someoe does not agree with ou, when you get a bit older you grow out of that. And Heysel was not their fault as well of course. For all the blaming of the bloke on the gate, the police, the ambulance men, the safety officer the fact is people turned up without a ticket. As they always did for scouse games in the 80's. I have not heard a call to sue the people that turned up without a ticket. Its the scouse desire to blame and sue someone that gets my goat. "Justice for the 96" means, blame everyone and everyone but scousers.. as they tried to do for Heysel. Did you know they tried to sue for watching the disaster on tv before the courts put a stop to that? Disgraceful. It was an accident, and a disaster. Very sad for the families of the dead, the police and emergency services that had to work the game, as was Bradford, but the scousers go on and on and on about it without one ounce of looking at the fault of their own fans or the impact it had on others.
you really embarrass yourself. you obviously haven't read up on any of the available facts about Hillsborough. so, please shut up.
Sure chuck insults if someoe does not agree with ou, when you get a bit older you grow out of that. And Heysel was not their fault as well of course. For all the blaming of the bloke on the gate, the police, the ambulance men, the safety officer the fact is people turned up without a ticket. As they always did for scouse games in the 80's. I have not heard a call to sue the people that turned up without a ticket. Its the scouse desire to blame and sue someone that gets my goat. "Justice for the 96" means, blame everyone and everyone but scousers.. as they tried to do for Heysel. Did you know they tried to sue for watching the disaster on tv before the courts put a stop to that? Disgraceful. It was an accident, and a disaster. Very sad for the families of the dead, the police and emergency services that had to work the game, as was Bradford, but the scousers go on and on and on about it without one ounce of looking at the fault of their own fans or the impact it had on others.
Sure chuck insults if someoe does not agree with ou, when you get a bit older you grow out of that. And Heysel was not their fault as well of course. For all the blaming of the bloke on the gate, the police, the ambulance men, the safety officer the fact is people turned up without a ticket. As they always did for scouse games in the 80's. I have not heard a call to sue the people that turned up without a ticket. Its the scouse desire to blame and sue someone that gets my goat. "Justice for the 96" means, blame everyone and everyone but scousers.. as they tried to do for Heysel. Did you know they tried to sue for watching the disaster on tv before the courts put a stop to that? Disgraceful. It was an accident, and a disaster. Very sad for the families of the dead, the police and emergency services that had to work the game, as was Bradford, but the scousers go on and on and on about it without one ounce of looking at the fault of their own fans or the impact it had on others.
you really embarrass yourself. you obviously haven't read up on any of the available facts about Hillsborough. so, please shut up.
Sure chuck insults if someoe does not agree with ou, when you get a bit older you grow out of that. And Heysel was not their fault as well of course. For all the blaming of the bloke on the gate, the police, the ambulance men, the safety officer the fact is people turned up without a ticket. As they always did for scouse games in the 80's. I have not heard a call to sue the people that turned up without a ticket. Its the scouse desire to blame and sue someone that gets my goat. "Justice for the 96" means, blame everyone and everyone but scousers.. as they tried to do for Heysel. Did you know they tried to sue for watching the disaster on tv before the courts put a stop to that? Disgraceful. It was an accident, and a disaster. Very sad for the families of the dead, the police and emergency services that had to work the game, as was Bradford, but the scousers go on and on and on about it without one ounce of looking at the fault of their own fans or the impact it had on others.
It's amazing how often that myth gets peddled out.
I'd advise you to read the offical report at the time to see how much effect fans turning up without tickets had on the tragedy.
Did you know the health and safety executive painstakingly sat through all the CCTV and counted every single fan entering the stadium and compared it to the tickets that were sold ?
Added to that, tickets were still available on the day.
Quite simply what you've suggested happened quite simply didn't. Just because newspapers and television media reported it at the time because of the misleading comments of an discredited official (and subsequently apologised) doesn't make it true.
So let us just again repeat the line from the Taylor report that you seem to be unable to understand:
Taylor surmised there was no substance to the allegation that ticketless fans caused the Disaster.
Quite what gives you the authority to have a different take on it is beyond comprehension. Did you commision your own report ?
Just a small point about "Taylor SURMISED there was no substance to the allegation that ticketless fans caused the disaster".
Definition of surmised;.........To infer something without sufficiently conclusive evidence.
In other words, a guess, not fact.
Read the report then ?