shaolinpunk
[Insert witty title here]
At this point, after so many people explaining it, I'm inclined to think he's
£30 less £3 is £27. Plus £2 is £29.This. You just need to follow the cash flows:
1. £30 from customer to restaurant
2. £3 from restaurant to customers
3. £2 from restaurant to waiter
This ends up, as HKFC says, with £25 in till, £2 in waiter's pocket, £1 each in pockets of three customers - add them up and that's your £30.
It's a genuine puzzle which I am genuinely trying to get my head round. To be fair a minority seem to have understood the question and attempted to explain but I'm still a bit hazy.At this point, after so many people explaining it, I'm inclined to think he's
£30 less £3 is £27. Plus £2 is £29.
you are on a wind up - you keep getting the right answer and telling them theyre wrong? You have the explanation, so stop going back to using the wrong equations to prove them wrong please
Thanks. That's 2 decent answers right at the end the of the thread.As others have said, it is the phrasing of the question that is designed to make it sound complicated.
The diners pay £10 each. So that's £30 in total.
The waiter brings back a £5. Each diner takes a pound back, £3 in total. They've now paid £9 each.
There's £27 left (£30 - £3). The waiter takes £2 as a tip, and there's £25 left in the till to pay for the dinner.
In summary:
£25 dinner + £2 tip + £3 back to the diners = £30
I am not on a wind up. Only Guy Fawkes has really come close to explaining it. A lot of people have simply got their facts wrong in their attempt to explain. It is a genuine puzzle from a mathematician. I suspect some people can easily get their head round it but only Guy Fawkes has proved he can explain it. You might be a mathematician yourself but my gut feeling tells me not. Maybe you don't like the thread because you struggle with numbers.
Thanks. That's 2 decent answers right at the end the of the thread.
either that or I am a din. I think it's more a case that you did not understand the question, did not know the answer or could not explain itWell I have suggested you getting your money out to work it out - if you find written explanations difficult to understand, do it visually and then you might understand the answers given to you. Otherwise, I would concur that you are on a wind up.
either that or I am a din. I think it's more a case that you did not understand the question, did not know the answer or could not explain it
3 peeps out for a meal. Initially waiter tells them the total bill is £30. They give him £10 each. The waiter realises the bill is wrong and should only be £25. He takes five pound coins from the till. He gives them back one quid each and they let him keep £2 as a tip.
The 3 customers have therefore paid £9 each which is £27 total and the waiter has kept £2. What has happened to the other pound? At the time of writing I genuinely don't know the answer! HELP
Better mop up after this thread before we get any more maggots crawling around.Jesus. I did not need to explain it as it had already been satisfactorily explained in the first few posts of the thread (THPP's explanation springs to mind)! You are the one who cannot understand the explanations, hence my suggestion to get your money out and try it and then maybe you will understand those explanations. If you found that beneath you, then you do not actually want to find out how this puzzle works. And that, sir, makes you a complete and utter din. And a divot.
Ok, the initial question didn't confuse me at all and it seemed fairly simple.
Now that I've read all the responses I feel like I must have missed something, what is the problem meant to be?