So there is at least one line in the bible that is as relavent today (could be relavent or totally irrelevant) as it was when it was written. So what?
Which side of the arguement are you again? People do not believe in god when they are born, they are preached to and told to believe. You could argue that those people who believe are therefore sheep. And in the past, most people believed in god (matching your point about this forum), so were they sheep?
Just because people chose to believe what Stephen Fry argued, which was against the church, then they must be the sheep who can't think for themselves? Do you not see how twisted your arguement is? Preachers try to do people's thinking for them, but someone stands against it, people listen, and suddenly they're the sheep. While I respect your right to your opinion, I find your arguements to be totally without logic or fact.
I spoke to a priest the other day and told him i was reading the bible from cover to cover. Rather than impinge his interpretation of the bible and its rules etc on me, he basically said, 'how do YOU interpret' and 'what does it mean to YOU', 'what sense can YOU make out of it'. THAT is not preaching but giving power to the individual to engage their OWN brains. And NOT be a sheep. Maybe in the past people were sheep with regards to religion, in fact that's almost a dead cert, cos we had nothing else. BUT my argument is that in 2011 we can listen to both sides of the argument. We have never been better resourced and equipped than we are now. BUT people still wants things read for them, interpreted for them, put on a plate for them. People have NO excuse now to be sheep.